IEA The Future of Petrochemicals

WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:00.030
well welcome everybody thank you so much
00:00:02.000 00:00:02.010 for joining us today my name is
00:00:04.190 00:00:04.200 Katherine Specter I'm a research scholar
00:00:05.869 00:00:05.879 at the center on global energy policy
00:00:07.700 00:00:07.710 here at Columbia and tonight we're going
00:00:10.070 00:00:10.080 to be talking about the IEA s new report
00:00:12.890 00:00:12.900 the future of petrochemicals with its
00:00:15.440 00:00:15.450 co-lead author Peter Levi who I will
00:00:19.070 00:00:19.080 introduce in just a moment let me
00:00:21.740 00:00:21.750 quickly say that this event like all of
00:00:23.570 00:00:23.580 those at the center is being webcast
00:00:26.179 00:00:26.189 live and both the full video and a
00:00:28.580 00:00:28.590 podcast recording will be available on
00:00:30.620 00:00:30.630 our website and on iTunes in the next
00:00:32.990 00:00:33.000 couple of days and for those of you
00:00:35.270 00:00:35.280 watching online as well as people here
00:00:37.430 00:00:37.440 in the audience you can ask a question
00:00:38.569 00:00:38.579 for the panelists at any time using the
00:00:40.790 00:00:40.800 hashtag cg EP events and our twitter
00:00:44.299 00:00:44.309 handle columbia at columbia you energy
00:00:47.180 00:00:47.190 so keep that in mind I just want to say
00:00:50.869 00:00:50.879 a few words as well about tonight's
00:00:52.520 00:00:52.530 topic this study explores the role of
00:00:54.889 00:00:54.899 petrochemicals in global energy today
00:00:58.099 00:00:58.109 and also looks ahead to the future at
00:01:00.020 00:01:00.030 the growing role that petrochemicals
00:01:01.790 00:01:01.800 will play in oil and gas markets and
00:01:04.340 00:01:04.350 global energy security and in many of
00:01:07.280 00:01:07.290 the environmental themes that people are
00:01:09.020 00:01:09.030 talking about today and I have to say
00:01:11.300 00:01:11.310 this report is incredibly useful and and
00:01:14.060 00:01:14.070 also well-timed this is a topic that
00:01:15.980 00:01:15.990 many of us are grappling with now and
00:01:18.980 00:01:18.990 here at the center one of the things
00:01:20.179 00:01:20.189 we're working on is an analysis of
00:01:22.039 00:01:22.049 long-term oil demand and petrochemicals
00:01:24.800 00:01:24.810 are obviously a very key part of that I
00:01:27.499 00:01:27.509 was particularly struck by the fact that
00:01:29.950 00:01:29.960 last year we took a look at all the
00:01:32.149 00:01:32.159 other studies at there on long-term oil
00:01:34.190 00:01:34.200 demand and all those studies really did
00:01:36.170 00:01:36.180 emphasize petrochemicals as the biggest
00:01:39.200 00:01:39.210 source of oil demand growth in the
00:01:40.609 00:01:40.619 future but at least in the publicly
00:01:43.670 00:01:43.680 available materials none of them really
00:01:45.410 00:01:45.420 got into why or had a whole lot of
00:01:47.389 00:01:47.399 discussion about the rationale for that
00:01:50.840 00:01:50.850 and I found that striking and it seemed
00:01:54.410 00:01:54.420 to be as Peter terms at a real blind
00:01:57.109 00:01:57.119 spot for the industry and as I started
00:01:59.690 00:01:59.700 looking in the pet CEM sector myself I
00:02:01.399 00:02:01.409 started to realize why it's because it's
00:02:03.319 00:02:03.329 just very very difficult I think for
00:02:06.170 00:02:06.180 that reason we're really happy that IA
00:02:09.410 00:02:09.420 has spent the time and effort on this
00:02:11.420 00:02:11.430 report just to give one example
00:02:13.850 00:02:13.860 the expected shift to alternative
00:02:15.170 00:02:15.180 passenger vehicles whether it's electric
00:02:17.450 00:02:17.460 vehicles automated vehicles is expected
00:02:20.780 00:02:20.790 to reduce gasoline demand going forward
00:02:23.270 00:02:23.280 which should free up some light and
00:02:24.740 00:02:24.750 material for nap the production which is
00:02:26.930 00:02:26.940 of course one of the primary feedstocks
00:02:28.520 00:02:28.530 for petrochemicals at the same time the
00:02:31.630 00:02:31.640 expectation is that these new types of
00:02:34.160 00:02:34.170 vehicles will be constructed with a lot
00:02:36.290 00:02:36.300 more plastic which will in turn increase
00:02:38.660 00:02:38.670 demand for petrochemicals so there are a
00:02:40.910 00:02:40.920 lot of interesting interactions and
00:02:43.070 00:02:43.080 feedback loops like that that make it
00:02:45.350 00:02:45.360 very difficult in addition to the fact
00:02:47.720 00:02:47.730 that even I think by energy market
00:02:49.910 00:02:49.920 standards the challenges presented by
00:02:52.250 00:02:52.260 the availability and quality of data in
00:02:54.890 00:02:54.900 the sector are really a very big
00:02:57.199 00:02:57.209 challenge and so this report does a
00:02:58.610 00:02:58.620 tremendous service I think to the energy
00:03:00.440 00:03:00.450 community by not only compiling and
00:03:02.570 00:03:02.580 analyzing a really impressive collection
00:03:05.690 00:03:05.700 of data on this topic but also mapping
00:03:08.090 00:03:08.100 out many of these complexities and
00:03:10.160 00:03:10.170 trying to make sense of them I want to
00:03:15.260 00:03:15.270 just introduce our speakers peter is an
00:03:21.590 00:03:21.600 energy analyst in the energy technology
00:03:23.600 00:03:23.610 and policy division of the International
00:03:25.460 00:03:25.470 Energy Agency or the IEA he focuses on
00:03:28.280 00:03:28.290 analyzing energy intensive industries
00:03:30.009 00:03:30.019 particularly the chemical and
00:03:31.580 00:03:31.590 petrochemical sectors but also on other
00:03:33.979 00:03:33.989 cross-cutting themes with respect to
00:03:35.660 00:03:35.670 decarbonisation prior to joining the IEA
00:03:38.420 00:03:38.430 Peter attended the University of
00:03:39.680 00:03:39.690 Cambridge and the University of Bristol
00:03:41.030 00:03:41.040 obtaining degrees at both of those
00:03:43.490 00:03:43.500 universities both in engineering peter
00:03:45.830 00:03:45.840 also worked in the private sector as an
00:03:47.330 00:03:47.340 engineer for for a number of years peter
00:03:50.570 00:03:50.580 is going to give us an overview of the
00:03:51.890 00:03:51.900 findings of the IEA study and then we're
00:03:53.840 00:03:53.850 going to have a little bit of a
00:03:55.250 00:03:55.260 discussion around that and be joined by
00:03:58.240 00:03:58.250 Jason Board of who I think needs no
00:04:01.580 00:04:01.590 introduction but I'll introduce him
00:04:03.110 00:04:03.120 anyway
00:04:04.310 00:04:04.320 he Jason is going to offer a few
00:04:08.780 00:04:08.790 reactions to the presentation and
00:04:10.449 00:04:10.459 participate in some Q&A with us Jason
00:04:14.840 00:04:14.850 joined the Columbia faculty after
00:04:16.130 00:04:16.140 serving a special assistant to President
00:04:17.900 00:04:17.910 Obama and Senior Director for Energy and
00:04:19.820 00:04:19.830 Climate Change on the staff of the
00:04:21.620 00:04:21.630 National Security Council and prior to
00:04:23.180 00:04:23.190 that held senior positions on the White
00:04:25.700 00:04:25.710 House's national
00:04:26.730 00:04:26.740 Council and the Council on Environmental
00:04:28.620 00:04:28.630 Quality in addition to teaching at
00:04:30.900 00:04:30.910 Columbia's SEPA school Jason is of
00:04:33.210 00:04:33.220 course our founding director at the
00:04:34.559 00:04:34.569 center on global energy policy so
00:04:37.200 00:04:37.210 without further ado I'd like to invite
00:04:39.330 00:04:39.340 Peter up to walk us through some of the
00:04:41.370 00:04:41.380 study's findings and then we'll have
00:04:43.409 00:04:43.419 plenty of time for discussion afterwards
00:04:44.939 00:04:44.949 Peter thank you thank you very much
00:04:56.370 00:04:56.380 Katherine and thank you all for inviting
00:04:58.469 00:04:58.479 me here to speak and it's a real
00:05:00.300 00:05:00.310 privilege to come disseminate this
00:05:02.279 00:05:02.289 report after working on it with my with
00:05:05.129 00:05:05.139 my colleagues and back at the IEA and so
00:05:09.629 00:05:09.639 as Katherine said I'm here to talk about
00:05:11.249 00:05:11.259 their future of petrochemicals
00:05:12.540 00:05:12.550 publication that was released online on
00:05:15.450 00:05:15.460 the 5th of October and it's available
00:05:17.309 00:05:17.319 freely on the website you'll have to
00:05:20.309 00:05:20.319 register to to download it but it's it's
00:05:22.830 00:05:22.840 freely available there also Arabic and
00:05:25.110 00:05:25.120 Mandarin translations available on the
00:05:27.270 00:05:27.280 website and there's copies of the
00:05:29.610 00:05:29.620 executive summary printed out at the
00:05:31.260 00:05:31.270 back if you would like to take one with
00:05:32.670 00:05:32.680 you and I'm sure I don't need to do this
00:05:36.689 00:05:36.699 in this for this audience but and just
00:05:38.999 00:05:39.009 to give a brief background of the IEA
00:05:41.339 00:05:41.349 itself and just on a couple of slides
00:05:43.409 00:05:43.419 and the IEA is an autonomous
00:05:45.240 00:05:45.250 organization that works around the world
00:05:46.860 00:05:46.870 to support accelerated energy
00:05:48.450 00:05:48.460 transitions it does this with data there
00:05:52.350 00:05:52.360 and access from its member countries and
00:05:54.209 00:05:54.219 Beyond and this shows some of the IAS
00:05:57.990 00:05:58.000 family in a few slides
00:05:59.700 00:05:59.710 so the wider global family its member
00:06:01.920 00:06:01.930 countries there's 30 member countries
00:06:03.450 00:06:03.460 the Association and accession countries
00:06:05.999 00:06:06.009 and and partner countries and then also
00:06:11.129 00:06:11.139 the the wider network of countries that
00:06:13.200 00:06:13.210 the IEA works with to build its energy
00:06:15.719 00:06:15.729 data sets and so the IEA is using this
00:06:20.879 00:06:20.889 data and its expertise in this area to
00:06:23.159 00:06:23.169 look into what our executive director
00:06:25.469 00:06:25.479 not me if not me sadly but our executive
00:06:28.170 00:06:28.180 director terms coined this phrase of
00:06:30.240 00:06:30.250 blind spots in the energy system and and
00:06:32.999 00:06:33.009 this started by looking in the role of
00:06:34.740 00:06:34.750 the future of trucks then the future of
00:06:37.950 00:06:37.960 cooling and 20
00:06:39.150 00:06:39.160 this year and then now the future future
00:06:42.000 00:06:42.010 of petrochemicals this serious started
00:06:44.100 00:06:44.110 in 2017 so it's relatively new button
00:06:46.320 00:06:46.330 and this is the third in the series so
00:06:53.310 00:06:53.320 I'd like to start by giving an overview
00:06:55.350 00:06:55.360 of the role of petrochemicals today in
00:06:57.510 00:06:57.520 in society and in the energy system and
00:07:00.540 00:07:00.550 also the role with respect of its role
00:07:03.690 00:07:03.700 with respect to the environment and the
00:07:07.170 00:07:07.180 first kind of perhaps obvious point to
00:07:10.140 00:07:10.150 many of you but one that's worth
00:07:12.120 00:07:12.130 emphasizing is that petrochemicals are
00:07:13.890 00:07:13.900 all around us and in this room we've got
00:07:16.980 00:07:16.990 tables full of plastic bottles plastic
00:07:18.900 00:07:18.910 chairs and this you never have to look
00:07:21.540 00:07:21.550 very far in the built environment to see
00:07:23.760 00:07:23.770 a petrochemical product so just to
00:07:26.280 00:07:26.290 provide to draw out a few examples and
00:07:27.810 00:07:27.820 this slide and this infographic we
00:07:29.130 00:07:29.140 produced and so there's a cluster of
00:07:32.580 00:07:32.590 things that you find around the home in
00:07:33.900 00:07:33.910 office many personal items digital
00:07:36.300 00:07:36.310 devices clothing polyester clothing and
00:07:40.440 00:07:40.450 then in the background PVC important
00:07:43.470 00:07:43.480 material and buildings plastic pipes
00:07:45.470 00:07:45.480 membranes waterproof membranes and in
00:07:48.240 00:07:48.250 houses and and damp proof courses then
00:07:51.840 00:07:51.850 we've got a set of products that are
00:07:52.950 00:07:52.960 integral to our food supplier now and
00:07:55.460 00:07:55.470 and yeah and even drinks and securing a
00:08:00.390 00:08:00.400 food supply from the farm to the plate
00:08:02.310 00:08:02.320 so we've got fertilizers pesticides and
00:08:05.580 00:08:05.590 of course packaging both in the
00:08:07.230 00:08:07.240 background getting it from between
00:08:09.330 00:08:09.340 businesses but then also they're the
00:08:11.100 00:08:11.110 consumer packaging that we will interact
00:08:13.020 00:08:13.030 with then we've got another cluster of
00:08:16.820 00:08:16.830 products that facilitate transportation
00:08:19.530 00:08:19.540 and so we've got tires plastics and cars
00:08:24.470 00:08:24.480 various fluids in a multitude of
00:08:27.659 00:08:27.669 vehicles acids and hydraulic fluids all
00:08:30.450 00:08:30.460 containing petrochemical products and
00:08:32.810 00:08:32.820 then finally just to draw your attention
00:08:34.950 00:08:34.960 to a kind of close to home topic for the
00:08:37.320 00:08:37.330 IEA and petrochemicals are used in in
00:08:41.310 00:08:41.320 many aspects of technologies and
00:08:44.280 00:08:44.290 products that we will need for the clean
00:08:45.780 00:08:45.790 energy transition wind turbine blades
00:08:48.270 00:08:48.280 here is an important example of
00:08:49.890 00:08:49.900 lightweight carbon fiber composites
00:08:52.340 00:08:52.350 the other materials both of the future
00:08:54.890 00:08:54.900 and traditional materials that we use
00:08:56.300 00:08:56.310 today for these technologies so now
00:09:03.770 00:09:03.780 taking a bit of a look back Petro
00:09:05.510 00:09:05.520 chemicals have been demand for the
00:09:07.730 00:09:07.740 petrochemical products have been growing
00:09:09.050 00:09:09.060 very fast and if we focus on plastics
00:09:11.930 00:09:11.940 here in the context of broader bulk
00:09:14.090 00:09:14.100 material demand and until the millennium
00:09:17.180 00:09:17.190 several of these bulk materials group
00:09:18.760 00:09:18.770 broadly in line with GDP is include
00:09:22.610 00:09:22.620 aluminium cement and steel and after the
00:09:27.920 00:09:27.930 million many of these materials picked
00:09:30.020 00:09:30.030 up their pace broadly because of China's
00:09:33.260 00:09:33.270 economic growth and development to
00:09:35.650 00:09:35.660 support it's a huge explosion of
00:09:39.010 00:09:39.020 infrastructure and construction projects
00:09:42.320 00:09:42.330 and then plastics key group of
00:09:45.380 00:09:45.390 petrochemical products which I'll talk
00:09:46.610 00:09:46.620 about a lot in this presentation and
00:09:48.490 00:09:48.500 have grown faster than any of these bulk
00:09:50.960 00:09:50.970 materials over this time period grown by
00:09:53.060 00:09:53.070 almost tenfold since 1970 and nearly
00:09:55.820 00:09:55.830 doubling since the millennium more than
00:09:58.280 00:09:58.290 doubling since millennium this is
00:10:00.830 00:10:00.840 explained in part by the fact that since
00:10:02.750 00:10:02.760 the middle of the last century plastics
00:10:04.280 00:10:04.290 have become substitutes for many of the
00:10:05.930 00:10:05.940 other materials in this in this picture
00:10:07.910 00:10:07.920 and other materials outside it and this
00:10:10.610 00:10:10.620 is because plastics are relatively cheap
00:10:12.230 00:10:12.240 they're versatile and they can offer
00:10:14.030 00:10:14.040 quite tailored solutions to a given
00:10:16.850 00:10:16.860 material application and sticking with
00:10:22.070 00:10:22.080 plastics again and this group of
00:10:25.340 00:10:25.350 materials will continue to be a big
00:10:27.260 00:10:27.270 demand driver for their for the
00:10:28.880 00:10:28.890 petrochemical sector and advanced
00:10:32.120 00:10:32.130 economies such as the US and Korea and
00:10:34.190 00:10:34.200 Canada currently consume up to 20 times
00:10:37.100 00:10:37.110 as much plastic resin as those of
00:10:39.140 00:10:39.150 developing countries and such as India
00:10:41.720 00:10:41.730 many countries in Africa and plastic
00:10:45.770 00:10:45.780 demand is driven in part by manufactured
00:10:47.930 00:10:47.940 domestic manufacturing industries to
00:10:49.430 00:10:49.440 make other plastic products but also by
00:10:52.010 00:10:52.020 export markets in 2016 the US and Saudi
00:10:55.490 00:10:55.500 Arabia were the biggest export of
00:10:57.170 00:10:57.180 polyethylene which is a key plastic
00:10:59.000 00:10:59.010 resin again something that will come up
00:11:01.190 00:11:01.200 quite a lot in this presentation the
00:11:03.100 00:11:03.110 largest import was China
00:11:05.689 00:11:05.699 followed by Germany petrochemical
00:11:10.579 00:11:10.589 sectors a very large consumer of oil and
00:11:12.710 00:11:12.720 gas today the secretary accounts for 14%
00:11:15.979 00:11:15.989 of 30 million barrels per day
00:11:17.629 00:11:17.639 NBD of global demand and 8% or 300
00:11:22.249 00:11:22.259 billion cubic meters of gas demand so
00:11:30.049 00:11:30.059 half of the chemical sectors total
00:11:32.629 00:11:32.639 energy inputs are consumed as feedstock
00:11:34.159 00:11:34.169 and when I say feedstock I'm referring
00:11:36.470 00:11:36.480 to the fuels oil and gas the same fuels
00:11:40.159 00:11:40.169 that are used to fuel the chemical
00:11:41.479 00:11:41.489 sector are also used as its speed stocks
00:11:43.429 00:11:43.439 but these are become physically embedded
00:11:45.679 00:11:45.689 in the products themselves and the
00:11:46.999 00:11:47.009 molecules of oil and gas that I've taken
00:11:50.299 00:11:50.309 out of the ground then becoming
00:11:51.799 00:11:51.809 physically embedded in the plastic
00:11:53.030 00:11:53.040 products that we we use every day
00:11:55.659 00:11:55.669 this diagram shows how oil and gas but
00:11:58.669 00:11:58.679 also coal are used as raw materials to
00:12:02.449 00:12:02.459 produce different primary chemicals and
00:12:04.099 00:12:04.109 how they're then converted further
00:12:06.259 00:12:06.269 downstream into commodities and
00:12:09.259 00:12:09.269 ultimately consumer goods oils the
00:12:12.439 00:12:12.449 promit prominent predominant feedstock
00:12:14.869 00:12:14.879 for high-value chemicals which are the
00:12:16.309 00:12:16.319 main precursors to plastics and then
00:12:19.849 00:12:19.859 coal and gas and the main feedstocks for
00:12:22.249 00:12:22.259 ammonia and methanol and these are these
00:12:24.019 00:12:24.029 are the main chemicals that we look at
00:12:25.279 00:12:25.289 in in the analysis HV C's or high-value
00:12:30.829 00:12:30.839 chemicals ammonia and methanol count for
00:12:32.900 00:12:32.910 around two-thirds of the total energy
00:12:34.759 00:12:34.769 inputs to the to the chemical and
00:12:36.470 00:12:36.480 petrochemical sector so you can imagine
00:12:38.960 00:12:38.970 my reach narrower analytical scope to
00:12:41.929 00:12:41.939 the to the 8020 benefits of that
00:12:44.739 00:12:44.749 selection so when looking at the
00:12:50.419 00:12:50.429 petrochemical industry in a more
00:12:51.739 00:12:51.749 regional fashion and there's we can see
00:12:55.009 00:12:55.019 that there's no one-size-fits-all for
00:12:56.689 00:12:56.699 either production or feedstock use so
00:13:00.650 00:13:00.660 asia-pacific particularly China
00:13:02.739 00:13:02.749 dominates global primary chemical
00:13:05.210 00:13:05.220 production and with Europe North America
00:13:08.629 00:13:08.639 and the Middle East
00:13:09.619 00:13:09.629 accounting for most of the rest
00:13:12.850 00:13:12.860 translating this into the feedstock
00:13:14.749 00:13:14.759 picture and there's also significant
00:13:17.600 00:13:17.610 diversity among the share
00:13:19.129 00:13:19.139 of resources used in each region to
00:13:20.809 00:13:20.819 produce these primary chemicals if we
00:13:23.960 00:13:23.970 look at the four largest regions and
00:13:26.329 00:13:26.339 these regions are returned to and
00:13:28.329 00:13:28.339 because they're important from multiple
00:13:32.059 00:13:32.069 points of view but very interesting on
00:13:33.949 00:13:33.959 this feedstock diversity picture and
00:13:37.519 00:13:37.529 along with the Middle East the US has a
00:13:40.549 00:13:40.559 feedstock advantage in its access to
00:13:42.979 00:13:42.989 low-cost ethane to abundant supplies of
00:13:46.099 00:13:46.109 natural gas and the and the shale gas
00:13:48.169 00:13:48.179 revolution in contrast Asia Pacific and
00:13:52.099 00:13:52.109 Europe rely mainly on naphtha and where
00:13:55.400 00:13:55.410 the when the spread between prices of
00:13:57.499 00:13:57.509 natural gas liquids and crude is as
00:14:00.139 00:14:00.149 large this puts these regions at a
00:14:02.269 00:14:02.279 disadvantage in terms of feedstock cost
00:14:07.299 00:14:07.309 China constitutes a key outlier and on
00:14:11.090 00:14:11.100 the feedstock front because it uses
00:14:13.039 00:14:13.049 quite a lot of coals feedstock around a
00:14:15.019 00:14:15.029 quarter of the feedstock used in Egypt
00:14:17.840 00:14:17.850 Asia Pacific to produce primary
00:14:19.549 00:14:19.559 chemicals it's coal and I think nearly
00:14:22.159 00:14:22.169 all of that is in China so these
00:14:28.129 00:14:28.139 difference in feedstocks choices across
00:14:30.590 00:14:30.600 regions are reflect a reflection and the
00:14:32.689 00:14:32.699 big contribution of feedstock costs to
00:14:34.489 00:14:34.499 production costs in this slide we're
00:14:36.829 00:14:36.839 displaying simplified levelized cost to
00:14:38.989 00:14:38.999 petrochemicals which is a a metric that
00:14:41.329 00:14:41.339 can be taken as a proxy for overall
00:14:43.429 00:14:43.439 production cost the middle-east and the
00:14:46.460 00:14:46.470 u.s. remain the regions where producing
00:14:48.530 00:14:48.540 these commodities from ethane is more
00:14:50.809 00:14:50.819 advantageous
00:14:51.590 00:14:51.600 whereas naphtha based production is less
00:14:53.359 00:14:53.369 economical but dominant in other regions
00:14:55.669 00:14:55.679 due to their lack of access to low cost
00:14:58.579 00:14:58.589 ethane the feedstock choice doesn't only
00:15:02.059 00:15:02.069 impact costs but also the process yields
00:15:04.220 00:15:04.230 so you don't get the same diversity of
00:15:06.199 00:15:06.209 products from using ethane so you have
00:15:08.239 00:15:08.249 to use other on-purpose technologies to
00:15:10.100 00:15:10.110 produce some of the products that are in
00:15:11.600 00:15:11.610 deficit whereas naphtha produces lower
00:15:15.229 00:15:15.239 amounts of high-value chemicals per you
00:15:17.269 00:15:17.279 know the naps are used but then you get
00:15:19.129 00:15:19.139 a better balance between the products
00:15:21.379 00:15:21.389 you produce ethylene propylene and and
00:15:23.269 00:15:23.279 the aromatics
00:15:27.530 00:15:27.540 and so now looking at their kind of the
00:15:31.190 00:15:31.200 petrochemical refining dimension again
00:15:33.510 00:15:33.520 something I'll return to on subsequent
00:15:35.490 00:15:35.500 slides and with growing demand for
00:15:38.190 00:15:38.200 petrochemical products oil companies
00:15:40.050 00:15:40.060 especially the refining components of
00:15:42.060 00:15:42.070 the oil industry are increasingly
00:15:43.590 00:15:43.600 expanding into their petrochemicals
00:15:45.060 00:15:45.070 business through what we call like
00:15:47.130 00:15:47.140 refining petrochemical integration there
00:15:49.200 00:15:49.210 are various forms of this that we go
00:15:51.720 00:15:51.730 into more in more detail in the reports
00:15:54.630 00:15:54.640 various degrees and various models for
00:15:56.550 00:15:56.560 doing so but the current interest in
00:15:59.340 00:15:59.350 petrochemical integration reflects the
00:16:01.730 00:16:01.740 preoccupation refining industry to seek
00:16:04.230 00:16:04.240 more resilient forms of revenue in the
00:16:06.240 00:16:06.250 face of a stagnating or potentially
00:16:09.630 00:16:09.640 stagnating demand for traditional
00:16:11.100 00:16:11.110 products and so in recent years margins
00:16:14.190 00:16:14.200 from selling transport fuels such as
00:16:15.600 00:16:15.610 gasoline and diesel have narrowed and
00:16:17.850 00:16:17.860 selling petrochemical feedstocks raw is
00:16:21.329 00:16:21.339 in many cases not profitable as the
00:16:23.550 00:16:23.560 prices for naphtha and LPG are often
00:16:25.350 00:16:25.360 below the the price at which it costs
00:16:27.269 00:16:27.279 below the cost price of extracting them
00:16:29.430 00:16:29.440 and and the petrochemical paths can
00:16:32.430 00:16:32.440 order can offer higher margins by
00:16:34.500 00:16:34.510 converting them into a more high-value
00:16:36.450 00:16:36.460 product and this this slide shows the
00:16:38.880 00:16:38.890 some margins for the European context
00:16:41.900 00:16:41.910 for fuels and for the petrochemical
00:16:45.270 00:16:45.280 routes and of course intricate
00:16:48.960 00:16:48.970 integration between refineries and
00:16:50.490 00:16:50.500 petrochemical plants can offer other
00:16:51.720 00:16:51.730 benefits that you would have in any in
00:16:54.600 00:16:54.610 more generic industrial integration
00:16:56.820 00:16:56.830 benefits sharing utilities integrating
00:16:59.790 00:16:59.800 process flows capturing waste heat all
00:17:03.329 00:17:03.339 of those benefits are also able to be
00:17:05.400 00:17:05.410 captured by the through greater
00:17:06.689 00:17:06.699 integration potentially and as I said
00:17:12.780 00:17:12.790 integration comes in many different
00:17:14.220 00:17:14.230 forms and flavors for example in the US
00:17:17.069 00:17:17.079 and the Middle East they're readily
00:17:18.480 00:17:18.490 available in natural gas liquids and so
00:17:21.240 00:17:21.250 this leads the upstream petrochemical to
00:17:24.600 00:17:24.610 refining sorry a upstream natural gas
00:17:29.400 00:17:29.410 liquid production and then petrochemical
00:17:32.070 00:17:32.080 production as the prevailing option for
00:17:34.860 00:17:34.870 integration many oil companies who
00:17:37.950 00:17:37.960 produce NGOs have also invested in
00:17:39.660 00:17:39.670 petrochemical production
00:17:40.680 00:17:40.690 facilities notably around the Gulf Coast
00:17:42.710 00:17:42.720 but there is no operation or overlap as
00:17:45.539 00:17:45.549 such between these facilities in other
00:17:48.240 00:17:48.250 regions where there's limited available
00:17:50.669 00:17:50.679 where availability of NGOs is limited
00:17:53.190 00:17:53.200 and and therefore they use naphtha as a
00:17:55.950 00:17:55.960 feedstock the case for operational
00:17:57.869 00:17:57.879 integration is is stronger from our
00:18:02.430 00:18:02.440 analysis of this topic
00:18:03.600 00:18:03.610 it seems that of the role of oil
00:18:06.659 00:18:06.669 companies in the petrochemical sphere is
00:18:08.700 00:18:08.710 set to increase and but in a variety of
00:18:11.399 00:18:11.409 different ways of showing the u.s.
00:18:12.629 00:18:12.639 context but we also look at the Chinese
00:18:14.310 00:18:14.320 context which is quite different and
00:18:18.320 00:18:18.330 then the last thing I want to revisit in
00:18:20.850 00:18:20.860 the kind of petrochemicals today of
00:18:23.220 00:18:23.230 section the presentation is the the
00:18:24.779 00:18:24.789 environmental toll that petrochemical
00:18:26.879 00:18:26.889 products as a petrochemicals take on the
00:18:29.759 00:18:29.769 environment and the chemical sector is
00:18:32.220 00:18:32.230 the largest industrial energy consumer
00:18:33.960 00:18:33.970 that's something that some people find
00:18:35.220 00:18:35.230 surprising they're not familiar with the
00:18:37.649 00:18:37.659 energy statistics and it's a head of
00:18:40.590 00:18:40.600 iron and steel and cement accounts for
00:18:44.430 00:18:44.440 approximately 10% of total final energy
00:18:46.710 00:18:46.720 consumption and almost 30% of industrial
00:18:49.230 00:18:49.240 final energy consumption however this
00:18:51.629 00:18:51.639 sector is only the third largest source
00:18:53.340 00:18:53.350 of co2 emissions and this is because of
00:18:56.009 00:18:56.019 this feedstock concept that I introduced
00:18:58.200 00:18:58.210 earlier and that half of their more than
00:19:00.149 00:19:00.159 half of the feeds chemical sectors
00:19:02.369 00:19:02.379 energy input becomes in but embedded in
00:19:04.379 00:19:04.389 the in the products themselves and
00:19:05.789 00:19:05.799 there's not combusted
00:19:06.659 00:19:06.669 not leading to co2 emissions within the
00:19:09.149 00:19:09.159 boundary of the chemical sector but
00:19:14.580 00:19:14.590 there are two important takeaways from
00:19:18.269 00:19:18.279 this picture that maybe are in the
00:19:21.210 00:19:21.220 background
00:19:21.749 00:19:21.759 and although feedstock inputs don't
00:19:25.409 00:19:25.419 contribute to emissions within the
00:19:26.759 00:19:26.769 chemical sector and they they contribute
00:19:30.299 00:19:30.309 to process emissions and they can
00:19:31.649 00:19:31.659 contribute to emissions downstream of
00:19:33.299 00:19:33.309 the chemical sector depending on how
00:19:35.039 00:19:35.049 chemical products are disposed of and
00:19:37.409 00:19:37.419 used and and secondly although the
00:19:40.680 00:19:40.690 chemical sector is the third largest
00:19:42.029 00:19:42.039 emitter is still a very large emitter
00:19:43.970 00:19:43.980 approximately 1.5 gigatons per year of
00:19:47.039 00:19:47.049 co2 and then a further three to four
00:19:50.190 00:19:50.200 hundred million tonnes of co2 equivalent
00:19:51.899 00:19:51.909 in
00:19:52.470 00:19:52.480 non co2 ghd's greenhouse gases and so
00:19:58.080 00:19:58.090 now I'd like to move to talk about one
00:20:00.270 00:20:00.280 of the two futures that we outline
00:20:02.940 00:20:02.950 potential futures do we outline for
00:20:04.770 00:20:04.780 their their chemical and petrochemical
00:20:05.789 00:20:05.799 sector and the first one we called the
00:20:08.280 00:20:08.290 reference technology scenario and I'll
00:20:09.630 00:20:09.640 spend relatively less time on this and
00:20:12.230 00:20:12.240 and the reference technology scenario
00:20:15.659 00:20:15.669 projects forward current trends that we
00:20:17.490 00:20:17.500 observe today and such as announced
00:20:19.860 00:20:19.870 capacity additions and things in the
00:20:22.500 00:20:22.510 physical domain but also takes account
00:20:25.590 00:20:25.600 of firm policy commitments that would
00:20:28.710 00:20:28.720 have an impact on there but on the
00:20:30.060 00:20:30.070 petrochemical sector so we expect demand
00:20:35.250 00:20:35.260 for plastics one of the key drivers of
00:20:36.930 00:20:36.940 the sector to remain relatively robust
00:20:39.710 00:20:39.720 and this diagram shows key
00:20:45.299 00:20:45.309 thermoplastics that we analyzed in
00:20:47.310 00:20:47.320 detail that we characterize in detail
00:20:48.690 00:20:48.700 with the in the in the modeling and as
00:20:52.380 00:20:52.390 developing countries increase their
00:20:53.880 00:20:53.890 population and wealth these materials
00:20:55.320 00:20:55.330 are increasingly in demand and and
00:20:57.690 00:20:57.700 particularly sector sectors such as
00:20:59.370 00:20:59.380 packaging and construction key growth
00:21:02.340 00:21:02.350 areas for for these materials on a per
00:21:07.230 00:21:07.240 capita basis demand for these plastics
00:21:09.780 00:21:09.790 increases by more than 50 percent
00:21:11.100 00:21:11.110 between 2020 2010 and 2050 and and on an
00:21:16.200 00:21:16.210 absolute basis I believe it's more than
00:21:18.690 00:21:18.700 more than doubling
00:21:24.960 00:21:24.970 so now in our base case in reference
00:21:28.020 00:21:28.030 technologies scenario petrochemicals are
00:21:30.120 00:21:30.130 the largest single driver of oil demand
00:21:31.820 00:21:31.830 they're expected to count for more than
00:21:34.050 00:21:34.060 a third of total oil demand to 2030 and
00:21:37.920 00:21:37.930 more and nearly half to 2050 total oil
00:21:42.330 00:21:42.340 demand rises by nearly 10 million
00:21:44.070 00:21:44.080 barrels per day to 2030 in the reference
00:21:46.500 00:21:46.510 technology scenario this is across the
00:21:47.820 00:21:47.830 whole energy system and and this is
00:21:50.070 00:21:50.080 fueled by five key drivers and shipping
00:21:55.010 00:21:55.020 shipping is an important driver here and
00:21:58.860 00:21:58.870 it's it's actually its importance looks
00:22:00.600 00:22:00.610 diminished because it's in a category
00:22:02.400 00:22:02.410 with other sectors that are declining
00:22:03.960 00:22:03.970 but around one one MBD of shipping oil
00:22:08.040 00:22:08.050 demand growth in the RTS by 2030 and
00:22:11.310 00:22:11.320 this is fueled by expanding global
00:22:13.890 00:22:13.900 seaborne trade passenger vehicles is the
00:22:18.660 00:22:18.670 second one oil use in cars peaks in the
00:22:21.570 00:22:21.580 mid 2020s even though the global card
00:22:23.400 00:22:23.410 fleet rises by 50% in 2030 and this
00:22:26.790 00:22:26.800 leads to a 1.6 MBD increase aviation is
00:22:31.980 00:22:31.990 number three and consumption the
00:22:35.490 00:22:35.500 aviation sector increases by about two
00:22:37.230 00:22:37.240 MBD but between today and 2030 because
00:22:39.600 00:22:39.610 of the robust increases in travel demand
00:22:41.310 00:22:41.320 particularly in Asia and I believe it's
00:22:44.850 00:22:44.860 oh no this is to do with road freight to
00:22:47.730 00:22:47.740 the India figure I have here but it road
00:22:50.700 00:22:50.710 freight is number four just by
00:22:53.040 00:22:53.050 improvements in vehicle and logistical
00:22:54.960 00:22:54.970 efficiencies or demand for trucks grows
00:22:56.700 00:22:56.710 by 2.5 MBD and this is driven in part by
00:23:01.590 00:23:01.600 India expanding by a factor of three its
00:23:04.430 00:23:04.440 transport demand for goods and services
00:23:06.530 00:23:06.540 fight via trucking and then the largest
00:23:11.760 00:23:11.770 driver petrochemicals
00:23:13.200 00:23:13.210 um oil for petrochemical feedstocks
00:23:15.840 00:23:15.850 growth away more than 3 million barrels
00:23:17.430 00:23:17.440 per day but by 2030 in there in the
00:23:19.950 00:23:19.960 reference technology scenario while
00:23:21.930 00:23:21.940 there are increasing efforts in certain
00:23:23.520 00:23:23.530 regions to reduce the demand for
00:23:25.380 00:23:25.390 single-use plastics and increase
00:23:26.880 00:23:26.890 recycling and the overall underlying
00:23:29.760 00:23:29.770 demand for these materials and outweighs
00:23:33.060 00:23:33.070 this outweighs these efforts
00:23:36.780 00:23:36.790 and in terms of how where this demand
00:23:41.620 00:23:41.630 and production takes place or where the
00:23:43.120 00:23:43.130 production side takes place this slide
00:23:44.620 00:23:44.630 shows the the regional distribution
00:23:46.630 00:23:46.640 China in the US should show the largest
00:23:51.010 00:23:51.020 near-term capacity additions as a result
00:23:53.290 00:23:53.300 of the feedstock advantages that was
00:23:55.090 00:23:55.100 talking about earlier and in China's
00:23:57.100 00:23:57.110 case especially a strong source of local
00:23:59.080 00:23:59.090 demand for manufacturing longer term
00:24:02.080 00:24:02.090 growth is led by the Middle East
00:24:03.430 00:24:03.440 and then the rest of Asia are still and
00:24:05.770 00:24:05.780 particularly China by 2050 Asia Pacific
00:24:09.760 00:24:09.770 retains its position as the largest
00:24:12.790 00:24:12.800 chemical producing region and I should
00:24:14.950 00:24:14.960 draw your attention to this graph it's
00:24:17.110 00:24:17.120 quite small there that the axis for Asia
00:24:19.450 00:24:19.460 Pacific is I think three times the scale
00:24:23.080 00:24:23.090 of the other the other graphs so when
00:24:28.210 00:24:28.220 looking at the four key regions that I
00:24:29.680 00:24:29.690 mentioned earlier Europe Middle East and
00:24:31.840 00:24:31.850 North America and Asia Pacific and we if
00:24:36.130 00:24:36.140 we can zoom in on the exact feed stocks
00:24:38.410 00:24:38.420 they're using in each year here um e
00:24:41.140 00:24:41.150 Thames feed stock consumption for
00:24:42.880 00:24:42.890 high-value chemicals grows by 70 percent
00:24:44.830 00:24:44.840 by 2030 and in the favored region so the
00:24:48.250 00:24:48.260 US and the Middle East and North
00:24:50.680 00:24:50.690 American Middle East but mainly in the
00:24:51.880 00:24:51.890 US and and in part this growth is as a
00:24:55.840 00:24:55.850 result of exports and to of
00:24:59.230 00:24:59.240 petrochemical products to to Europe
00:25:03.570 00:25:03.580 however regions with continuing strong
00:25:06.250 00:25:06.260 growth in the in the long term rely
00:25:08.380 00:25:08.390 mostly on naphtha so this e same kind of
00:25:11.590 00:25:11.600 expansion in the shorter term in the
00:25:13.900 00:25:13.910 Middle East in the US is is not a
00:25:15.850 00:25:15.860 sustained thing throughout the scenario
00:25:17.730 00:25:17.740 longer term growth is shifts more to
00:25:20.590 00:25:20.600 naphtha as the availability of ethane
00:25:22.750 00:25:22.760 and ngl supplied Titans in the in the
00:25:25.780 00:25:25.790 late 2020s and then just a quick look
00:25:30.280 00:25:30.290 here at ammonia which is a key precursor
00:25:32.680 00:25:32.690 to most nitrogen nitrogenous fertilisers
00:25:35.950 00:25:35.960 all nitrogen all nitrogenous fertilisers
00:25:38.350 00:25:38.360 I believe and mainly natural gas across
00:25:41.740 00:25:41.750 most regions across our the important
00:25:44.080 00:25:44.090 regions we identify but then this strong
00:25:46.900 00:25:46.910 but flat
00:25:47.880 00:25:47.890 use of coal in in asia-pacific and again
00:25:51.570 00:25:51.580 mainly in China so I'd like to move now
00:25:56.430 00:25:56.440 to just talk about the alternative
00:25:58.080 00:25:58.090 future that we envisage for the for the
00:26:00.390 00:26:00.400 petrochemical sector whether we know we
00:26:02.610 00:26:02.620 project forward and and actually it's
00:26:05.430 00:26:05.440 not projecting forward this scenario is
00:26:07.200 00:26:07.210 very different to the reference
00:26:08.220 00:26:08.230 technology scenario we start with a goal
00:26:09.780 00:26:09.790 and I'm sure some of you are familiar
00:26:12.390 00:26:12.400 with the IEA s other scenarios this is a
00:26:15.240 00:26:15.250 sustainable development scenario
00:26:16.770 00:26:16.780 provides the global energy system
00:26:18.630 00:26:18.640 context for this for this deep dive into
00:26:21.630 00:26:21.640 the chemical sector and and this starts
00:26:24.150 00:26:24.160 from a series of goals that we want to
00:26:26.640 00:26:26.650 get to sustainability goals and then
00:26:28.830 00:26:28.840 works backwards to where we where we
00:26:30.840 00:26:30.850 what we need to do to get there and so
00:26:34.590 00:26:34.600 more specifically where we want to get
00:26:36.090 00:26:36.100 to is a more sustainable chemical
00:26:37.710 00:26:37.720 industry that can provide the world with
00:26:39.810 00:26:39.820 its products and but address several of
00:26:43.080 00:26:43.090 the environmental challenges that it
00:26:44.520 00:26:44.530 faces over their coming years and
00:26:46.580 00:26:46.590 including aspects of the United Nations
00:26:49.290 00:26:49.300 sustainable development goals or SDGs
00:26:51.720 00:26:51.730 and just calling out a couple of those
00:26:54.990 00:26:55.000 specifically SD g7 to do renewable
00:26:58.290 00:26:58.300 energy and s DG 13 to do with climate
00:27:00.570 00:27:00.580 action are obvious ones for the IEA to
00:27:02.910 00:27:02.920 until account and given our remit and
00:27:05.490 00:27:05.500 clean energy and the energy sector
00:27:08.310 00:27:08.320 accounting for the majority of
00:27:10.050 00:27:10.060 anthropogenic co2 emissions but we also
00:27:12.510 00:27:12.520 cast the net a bit wider in the spirit
00:27:14.460 00:27:14.470 of the sustainable development scenario
00:27:16.050 00:27:16.060 and look at broader aspects of the SDGs
00:27:20.180 00:27:20.190 in this analysis specifically and that
00:27:23.490 00:27:23.500 translates into the consideration of air
00:27:25.350 00:27:25.360 pollutants water pollutants in the form
00:27:27.570 00:27:27.580 of plastic pollution and water demand
00:27:30.870 00:27:30.880 alongside
00:27:31.800 00:27:31.810 co2 and here we have the RTS results the
00:27:36.240 00:27:36.250 reference or baseline results and then
00:27:41.250 00:27:41.260 there's cts results and the
00:27:42.780 00:27:42.790 environmental impacts of this scenario
00:27:46.020 00:27:46.030 decline rapidly by 2050 air pollution
00:27:49.620 00:27:49.630 declines by 85% water pollutants and
00:27:52.920 00:27:52.930 former plastic pollution by more than 90
00:27:54.840 00:27:54.850 percent and co2 emissions around 45%
00:27:57.690 00:27:57.700 lower
00:27:58.690 00:27:58.700 in 2050 than they are in today and the
00:28:03.340 00:28:03.350 next few slides take a look at a deeper
00:28:05.710 00:28:05.720 look at how that's how that's achieved
00:28:10.110 00:28:10.120 so the first element of context looked
00:28:13.000 00:28:13.010 at in the CTS is the CTS of the clean
00:28:15.730 00:28:15.740 technology scenario 5 if I wasn't clear
00:28:18.340 00:28:18.350 about that CTS and RTS and so the first
00:28:21.580 00:28:21.590 element of context to look at is the
00:28:23.080 00:28:23.090 demand for primary chemicals and the
00:28:25.030 00:28:25.040 role of recycling in reducing the demand
00:28:27.280 00:28:27.290 for primary chemicals so demand for
00:28:31.060 00:28:31.070 plastics can be satisfied either by
00:28:32.530 00:28:32.540 primary production from oil and gas and
00:28:34.330 00:28:34.340 or it can be satisfied by recycling
00:28:37.210 00:28:37.220 existing plastic products and therefore
00:28:39.850 00:28:39.860 not adding two additional primary
00:28:41.800 00:28:41.810 chemical demand the purple bars on this
00:28:45.430 00:28:45.440 slide show the dramatic increases in
00:28:46.960 00:28:46.970 secondary production that take place in
00:28:48.610 00:28:48.620 the CTS relative to the blue bars in the
00:28:51.580 00:28:51.590 RTS the red dots overlaying the bars
00:28:54.820 00:28:54.830 show both the average and the range of
00:28:57.280 00:28:57.290 recycling rates this is collection rates
00:28:59.710 00:28:59.720 across the resins that we analyzed and
00:29:02.770 00:29:02.780 the resins that we analyzed were shown
00:29:04.060 00:29:04.070 in that first very colorful graph in the
00:29:07.570 00:29:07.580 in the RTS section I can go back to that
00:29:10.120 00:29:10.130 later if you if you'd like to look at a
00:29:11.710 00:29:11.720 more and then finally the green bars
00:29:14.260 00:29:14.270 show the resulting primary chemical
00:29:15.820 00:29:15.830 savings from these increases in in
00:29:18.010 00:29:18.020 collection rates and this the results of
00:29:23.410 00:29:23.420 the CTS are more than 70 million tons of
00:29:25.960 00:29:25.970 primary chemical savings by 2050 or
00:29:28.540 00:29:28.550 around half of today's plastic
00:29:32.080 00:29:32.090 production taking place by secondary
00:29:33.760 00:29:33.770 routes so plastic recycling also has a
00:29:38.890 00:29:38.900 big impact on oil demand for
00:29:40.210 00:29:40.220 petrochemical feedstock and high
00:29:42.400 00:29:42.410 recycling rates in this in the CTS
00:29:44.410 00:29:44.420 reduces oil demand for feedstock by 2.4
00:29:46.870 00:29:46.880 MBD by 2050
00:29:48.790 00:29:48.800 however oil demand for chemical
00:29:50.740 00:29:50.750 feedstock in the CTS in the context of
00:29:52.810 00:29:52.820 declining demand or stagnating demand in
00:29:56.080 00:29:56.090 other sectors still grows by 3.6 MBD
00:29:59.280 00:29:59.290 reaching more than 15 MBD in 2050 if the
00:30:04.810 00:30:04.820 share of chemical feedstock in total
00:30:06.820 00:30:06.830 demand in the CCS is actually much
00:30:08.530 00:30:08.540 higher than in the RTS and that might be
00:30:11.050 00:30:11.060 intuitive to a lot see
00:30:12.430 00:30:12.440 but that's an interesting finding for us
00:30:14.680 00:30:14.690 and and by 2050 petrochemicals their
00:30:19.510 00:30:19.520 account for more than a quarter of the
00:30:20.950 00:30:20.960 global total for oil demand in this
00:30:23.350 00:30:23.360 clean technology scenario much higher
00:30:25.510 00:30:25.520 than their roughly 16 percent in there
00:30:27.940 00:30:27.950 in the end the reference technologies
00:30:30.040 00:30:30.050 tonight and just to reinforce this point
00:30:36.550 00:30:36.560 about the new oil demand dynamics in the
00:30:38.380 00:30:38.390 in the clean technologies scenario and
00:30:39.880 00:30:39.890 whether this is an interesting finding
00:30:42.160 00:30:42.170 that we were able to pull out and here
00:30:45.190 00:30:45.200 we have some regional per capita figures
00:30:47.110 00:30:47.120 for oil demand for row passenger
00:30:48.460 00:30:48.470 transport and then also for plastic
00:30:50.890 00:30:50.900 consumption add the oil required to
00:30:52.870 00:30:52.880 satisfy plastic consumption today in the
00:30:56.260 00:30:56.270 US and the EU per capita oil demand for
00:30:58.600 00:30:58.610 a passenger transport is between two and
00:31:01.060 00:31:01.070 five times as much as four plastic
00:31:03.010 00:31:03.020 consumption in China and India the ratio
00:31:06.340 00:31:06.350 is smaller but Road passenger transport
00:31:08.290 00:31:08.300 still eclipses that four and the oil
00:31:10.420 00:31:10.430 demand for a passenger transport still
00:31:11.890 00:31:11.900 eclipses that for plastic consumption so
00:31:16.150 00:31:16.160 this interesting feature of the CTS is
00:31:17.920 00:31:17.930 that on all four of these regions per
00:31:19.570 00:31:19.580 capita order oil demand for plastic
00:31:21.460 00:31:21.470 consumption overtakes that four row
00:31:23.110 00:31:23.120 passenger transport by 2050 and
00:31:26.640 00:31:26.650 petrochemicals as I've said before
00:31:28.360 00:31:28.370 whether I become the largest sector of
00:31:30.400 00:31:30.410 oil demand reaching a more than fifteen
00:31:34.630 00:31:34.640 MBD far higher than their seven MBD for
00:31:38.350 00:31:38.360 Road passenger transport so despite this
00:31:44.640 00:31:44.650 continuing growth in oil consumption in
00:31:47.290 00:31:47.300 the CTS emissions declined by about
00:31:49.150 00:31:49.160 forty five percent
00:31:50.230 00:31:50.240 showed on the environmental side the
00:31:53.080 00:31:53.090 introduction to the environment of slide
00:31:54.430 00:31:54.440 and forty five percent relative to
00:31:58.120 00:31:58.130 today's levels and this represents a
00:32:01.630 00:32:01.640 sixty percent decline relative to the
00:32:03.610 00:32:03.620 RTS in 2050 where it would have gone or
00:32:06.540 00:32:06.550 25 percent cumulative reduction in co2
00:32:09.580 00:32:09.590 emissions during the analysis period so
00:32:13.210 00:32:13.220 how can older man keep rising and
00:32:14.710 00:32:14.720 emissions go down well one of the
00:32:17.350 00:32:17.360 reasons goes back to the feedstock
00:32:18.690 00:32:18.700 element that a lot of this oil is
00:32:20.620 00:32:20.630 actually being embedded and physically
00:32:22.450 00:32:22.460 and chemical products but then there are
00:32:24.610 00:32:24.620 also other things taking
00:32:25.890 00:32:25.900 in the CTS that drive emissions down
00:32:28.310 00:32:28.320 sorry that's the cumulative emissions
00:32:30.270 00:32:30.280 there in the yellow yellow dots
00:32:32.660 00:32:32.670 cumulative emissions savings rather so
00:32:37.410 00:32:37.420 we've have grouped the emission savings
00:32:39.870 00:32:39.880 by lever here in this pie chart this is
00:32:42.000 00:32:42.010 all available in more detail in the
00:32:43.770 00:32:43.780 report but there are five main
00:32:45.720 00:32:45.730 categories carbon capture and
00:32:47.310 00:32:47.320 utilization and storage SEC US coal to
00:32:51.570 00:32:51.580 natural gas feedstock shifts which is a
00:32:53.250 00:32:53.260 particular with particularly relevant in
00:32:55.200 00:32:55.210 China energy efficiency plastic
00:32:58.530 00:32:58.540 recycling and the use of alternative
00:33:00.570 00:33:00.580 feedstocks and you can show the you can
00:33:03.240 00:33:03.250 see the shares there in cumulative
00:33:05.010 00:33:05.020 emissions savings terms CC us does there
00:33:08.850 00:33:08.860 does the heavy lifting on the emission
00:33:10.650 00:33:10.660 savings front and the chemical sector
00:33:12.840 00:33:12.850 represents some of the lowest cost
00:33:14.630 00:33:14.640 applications for CC us and in the energy
00:33:18.330 00:33:18.340 system and it is hard for according to
00:33:21.180 00:33:21.190 our modeling it's hard for alternative
00:33:22.860 00:33:22.870 feedstocks to compete with these
00:33:24.630 00:33:24.640 relatively low cost opportunities for CC
00:33:26.910 00:33:26.920 us when I talk about alternative
00:33:30.180 00:33:30.190 feedstocks we're gonna have one more
00:33:31.560 00:33:31.570 slide on this after this but it's we're
00:33:33.600 00:33:33.610 talking predominately about bioenergy
00:33:35.130 00:33:35.140 and electrolytic hydrogen energy
00:33:39.750 00:33:39.760 efficiency both from a continuous
00:33:41.390 00:33:41.400 improvement point of view so the
00:33:43.890 00:33:43.900 specific energy consumption of process
00:33:46.080 00:33:46.090 units improving gradually over time but
00:33:48.240 00:33:48.250 also from fundamental process shifts to
00:33:51.330 00:33:51.340 just process routes that are more energy
00:33:54.600 00:33:54.610 efficient inherently they deliver about
00:33:56.880 00:33:56.890 these shifts deliver around a quarter of
00:33:58.650 00:33:58.660 the savings and then coal to natural gas
00:34:01.020 00:34:01.030 shifts so reducing the process emissions
00:34:03.630 00:34:03.640 resulting from producing primary
00:34:05.310 00:34:05.320 chemicals gives a yields about another
00:34:07.560 00:34:07.570 quarter ambitious increases in recycling
00:34:12.060 00:34:12.070 that I showed on the previous slides
00:34:14.090 00:34:14.100 deliver around nine percent of the
00:34:16.919 00:34:16.929 cumulative emissions savings and this is
00:34:18.960 00:34:18.970 as a result of having to produce fewer
00:34:20.909 00:34:20.919 primary chemicals
00:34:25.560 00:34:25.570 and so just to provide a bit more detail
00:34:28.410 00:34:28.420 here on the key emissions lever in the
00:34:31.410 00:34:31.420 city in the city s which is CC us the
00:34:36.150 00:34:36.160 chemical sector hosts the largest CCU
00:34:38.430 00:34:38.440 application that's around today which is
00:34:40.920 00:34:40.930 the use of co2 concentrated co2 streams
00:34:45.210 00:34:45.220 from ammonia production as feedstock for
00:34:47.070 00:34:47.080 urea production so when people talk
00:34:49.380 00:34:49.390 about CCU and all of their future
00:34:51.000 00:34:51.010 applications this is by far the largest
00:34:52.920 00:34:52.930 one that happens today however this is a
00:34:56.430 00:34:56.440 temporary storage mechanism co2 from
00:34:59.370 00:34:59.380 urea that becomes embedded from ammonia
00:35:02.040 00:35:02.050 production is then released downstream
00:35:04.560 00:35:04.570 when urea is applied to fields and this
00:35:08.040 00:35:08.050 is the urea to come decomposes and the
00:35:10.470 00:35:10.480 co2 molecule is released so this is only
00:35:12.510 00:35:12.520 a temporary application but it's
00:35:14.010 00:35:14.020 important to consider it in the chemical
00:35:15.540 00:35:15.550 sector modelling because you don't
00:35:17.100 00:35:17.110 overestimate the cheap sources of co2
00:35:20.880 00:35:20.890 capture for storage by 2050 though
00:35:25.680 00:35:25.690 capture for permanent storage overtakes
00:35:27.750 00:35:27.760 the current application of utilization
00:35:30.120 00:35:30.130 and with around 220 million tons per
00:35:33.510 00:35:33.520 year being stored and been captured and
00:35:37.020 00:35:37.030 stored permanently and and so this means
00:35:40.710 00:35:40.720 by 2050 again that 35 percent of
00:35:43.230 00:35:43.240 emissions generated in the sector are
00:35:45.120 00:35:45.130 being captured or utilized by 2050 it's
00:35:52.110 00:35:52.120 a lot of a lot of dots there but shows
00:35:54.120 00:35:54.130 the the the rate of utilization and
00:35:57.000 00:35:57.010 storage in each year in each scenario
00:36:02.090 00:36:02.100 now I wanted to touch on one of the key
00:36:04.950 00:36:04.960 environmental problems that's garnering
00:36:06.480 00:36:06.490 a lot of attention around the world and
00:36:07.920 00:36:07.930 to do with the energy system more
00:36:09.270 00:36:09.280 broadly but it it relates quite clearly
00:36:11.550 00:36:11.560 to the chemical and petrochemical sector
00:36:12.960 00:36:12.970 or its product and that's plastic
00:36:15.740 00:36:15.750 leakage into the world's oceans
00:36:18.590 00:36:18.600 when disposed of improperly plastics can
00:36:21.510 00:36:21.520 and they do make their way into
00:36:23.220 00:36:23.230 waterways and eventually into the ocean
00:36:25.230 00:36:25.240 indirectly or directly and when they do
00:36:28.170 00:36:28.180 they can get broken down by sunlight
00:36:29.760 00:36:29.770 into tiny particles which there many
00:36:31.620 00:36:31.630 fish and other animals can ingest
00:36:33.570 00:36:33.580 mistake for food in the RTS the base
00:36:37.380 00:36:37.390 scenario with no current
00:36:39.150 00:36:39.160 firm commitments and coordinated across
00:36:41.520 00:36:41.530 multiple jurisdictions which which is
00:36:43.920 00:36:43.930 one of the things we think it will take
00:36:45.840 00:36:45.850 and with none of those commitments they
00:36:49.580 00:36:49.590 established a cumulative waist
00:36:52.910 00:36:52.920 accumulative plastic waste leakage into
00:36:55.320 00:36:55.330 the world's ocean increases more than
00:36:57.600 00:36:57.610 tenfold over the over the scenario
00:37:00.180 00:37:00.190 horizon in the CTS rapid and broad-based
00:37:05.640 00:37:05.650 improvements in waste management to
00:37:07.140 00:37:07.150 facilitate this near tripling in
00:37:08.910 00:37:08.920 collection rates that occurs in the CTS
00:37:10.770 00:37:10.780 lays the groundwork to dramatically
00:37:13.260 00:37:13.270 reduce the cumulative waste that's
00:37:15.300 00:37:15.310 flowing into the world's oceans and I
00:37:18.540 00:37:18.550 should mention that this doesn't take
00:37:19.710 00:37:19.720 into account any efforts to remove
00:37:22.140 00:37:22.150 plastic waste from the oceans this is
00:37:23.670 00:37:23.680 additions to to plastic waste leakage so
00:37:30.510 00:37:30.520 our analysis of investments associated
00:37:33.240 00:37:33.250 with primary chemical production shows
00:37:34.950 00:37:34.960 that the the CTS are clean technology
00:37:37.380 00:37:37.390 scenario can be pursued cost-effectively
00:37:39.330 00:37:39.340 and recycling and coal to gas feedstock
00:37:42.750 00:37:42.760 shifts in the CTS mean that cumulative
00:37:44.720 00:37:44.730 capital investment required is actually
00:37:46.830 00:37:46.840 lower in the clean technology scenario
00:37:48.690 00:37:48.700 than in their reference technology
00:37:50.040 00:37:50.050 scenario which is often surprising
00:37:52.740 00:37:52.750 finding and this is because recycling
00:37:57.330 00:37:57.340 means that you have to lowers demand for
00:38:00.030 00:38:00.040 primary chemicals and means you have to
00:38:01.620 00:38:01.630 build less expensive pieces of equipment
00:38:05.160 00:38:05.170 like steam crackers that cost a lot of
00:38:06.960 00:38:06.970 money and and also no second component
00:38:11.010 00:38:11.020 this coal to gas feedstock shifting the
00:38:13.200 00:38:13.210 capital intensity of coal based chemical
00:38:15.780 00:38:15.790 production is generally higher than
00:38:17.190 00:38:17.200 those utilizing gaseous and liquid
00:38:19.830 00:38:19.840 feedstocks so shifting away brings in
00:38:23.070 00:38:23.080 environmental benefit and also reduces
00:38:25.320 00:38:25.330 the capex
00:38:26.300 00:38:26.310 required and these savings from these
00:38:31.410 00:38:31.420 two key but these two key elements of
00:38:34.830 00:38:34.840 savings offset the costs that are
00:38:37.620 00:38:37.630 required for additional storage cap
00:38:40.140 00:38:40.150 carbon capture and storage equipment or
00:38:41.880 00:38:41.890 Kelvin capture equipment is the
00:38:43.680 00:38:43.690 investment that takes place in the
00:38:44.940 00:38:44.950 chemical sector
00:38:48.650 00:38:48.660 so this last graphic displays some
00:38:51.270 00:38:51.280 results from an off model analysis that
00:38:53.310 00:38:53.320 we performed to examine his alternative
00:38:55.770 00:38:55.780 feedstock routes in greater detail
00:38:57.390 00:38:57.400 because they didn't come through as much
00:38:58.950 00:38:58.960 in now in our modeling they didn't prove
00:39:01.710 00:39:01.720 as cost-effective a cost effective as CC
00:39:04.200 00:39:04.210 us and their modeling so we wanted to
00:39:05.790 00:39:05.800 take a bit of a more detailed look and
00:39:07.700 00:39:07.710 and I should stress that this these
00:39:10.320 00:39:10.330 results don't form part of the CTS but
00:39:12.660 00:39:12.670 they were kind of a side a side analysis
00:39:14.580 00:39:14.590 that we did so feedstocks were produced
00:39:18.630 00:39:18.640 from a carbon neutral energy source the
00:39:20.880 00:39:20.890 the benefits would be the elimination of
00:39:22.710 00:39:22.720 downstream additional missions and and
00:39:26.400 00:39:26.410 if products are oxidized during use or
00:39:29.010 00:39:29.020 disposal these emissions would either be
00:39:31.440 00:39:31.450 neutral or they would would would not
00:39:33.900 00:39:33.910 occur and also theoretically the
00:39:37.890 00:39:37.900 chemical sector could then move away
00:39:39.390 00:39:39.400 from using fossil fuel feedstocks and
00:39:41.790 00:39:41.800 fossil fuels altogether so firstly we
00:39:44.760 00:39:44.770 looked at a bioenergy only pathway and
00:39:47.040 00:39:47.050 this entails producing ammonia and
00:39:49.140 00:39:49.150 methanol directly from bioenergy via
00:39:51.360 00:39:51.370 gasification and and ethylene from bio
00:39:54.780 00:39:54.790 ethanol via dehydration and then the
00:39:57.900 00:39:57.910 propylene and the aromatics for which
00:39:59.610 00:39:59.620 there are not direct commercial routes
00:40:01.200 00:40:01.210 available at the moment or direct proven
00:40:03.900 00:40:03.910 scaled routes and methanol to olefin to
00:40:07.170 00:40:07.180 methanol to aromatics are used to come
00:40:08.910 00:40:08.920 up to convert methanol into propylene
00:40:11.910 00:40:11.920 aromatics and then secondly we looked at
00:40:15.420 00:40:15.430 electricity only pathways so this is
00:40:17.460 00:40:17.470 using electrolysis water electrolysis to
00:40:20.370 00:40:20.380 produce methanol and ammonia directly
00:40:23.010 00:40:23.020 and then again using the methanol to
00:40:25.170 00:40:25.180 olefin x' and methanol to aromatics
00:40:26.490 00:40:26.500 processes to convert methanol into the
00:40:29.820 00:40:29.830 olefins and aromatics that are required
00:40:31.980 00:40:31.990 in the CTS the CTS demand projections
00:40:36.210 00:40:36.220 were used for this side analysis that's
00:40:38.760 00:40:38.770 why the CTS crops up so the results are
00:40:43.650 00:40:43.660 pretty stark by 2050 the bioenergy
00:40:45.630 00:40:45.640 pathway requires nearly eight times the
00:40:47.760 00:40:47.770 bioenergy amount for all industry in a
00:40:49.740 00:40:49.750 similar low carbon pathway and in a an
00:40:52.170 00:40:52.180 SDS type world and in the electricity
00:40:55.680 00:40:55.690 pathway the demand for electricity
00:40:57.180 00:40:57.190 exceeds that for all industry and by 25
00:41:01.170 00:41:01.180 percent
00:41:02.150 00:41:02.160 again in a in a similar SDS type pathway
00:41:05.400 00:41:05.410 for industry in 2050 and this is
00:41:09.750 00:41:09.760 significant because industry is a very
00:41:11.520 00:41:11.530 large electricity consumer and there are
00:41:15.300 00:41:15.310 other challenges that are explored more
00:41:17.400 00:41:17.410 in the book in these to do with these
00:41:19.050 00:41:19.060 electricity and bioenergy only pathways
00:41:21.270 00:41:21.280 to do with water demand and the large
00:41:23.220 00:41:23.230 amount of co2 required for the
00:41:24.930 00:41:24.940 electricity pathway in in a world that
00:41:28.650 00:41:28.660 you would imagine would be fairly
00:41:30.000 00:41:30.010 heavily decarbonized by that point and
00:41:32.180 00:41:32.190 just to draw attention to the the dashed
00:41:34.650 00:41:34.660 bars and which are very faint on the
00:41:37.050 00:41:37.060 screen but the dash bars show the
00:41:38.820 00:41:38.830 additional energy requirements were all
00:41:41.250 00:41:41.260 of the chemicals that are currently
00:41:42.810 00:41:42.820 being produced in refineries were also
00:41:44.849 00:41:44.859 produced by these routes it might be a
00:41:47.580 00:41:47.590 bit odd to have oil refineries still
00:41:50.640 00:41:50.650 going but your entire chemical industry
00:41:52.680 00:41:52.690 not utilizing fossil fuels so we we
00:41:55.320 00:41:55.330 wanted to get some idea of what the
00:41:58.170 00:41:58.180 total shift would require so now
00:42:04.740 00:42:04.750 returning back to the CTS and the policy
00:42:06.990 00:42:07.000 recommendations that we we think would
00:42:10.320 00:42:10.330 be required to to get us there or some
00:42:12.810 00:42:12.820 of them we divided these top ten
00:42:15.329 00:42:15.339 recommendations into two groups and the
00:42:17.609 00:42:17.619 first set is more associated with the
00:42:19.980 00:42:19.990 production of primary chemicals whereas
00:42:21.990 00:42:22.000 the second set is to do with their use
00:42:23.910 00:42:23.920 and disposal of chemical products and so
00:42:28.380 00:42:28.390 we have some I don't use too much time
00:42:31.680 00:42:31.690 we can discuss discuss these in more
00:42:33.630 00:42:33.640 detail on there and they're written down
00:42:34.890 00:42:34.900 here but and these I think these first
00:42:37.920 00:42:37.930 five recommendations will be quite
00:42:39.300 00:42:39.310 familiar to those who read in-depth IEA
00:42:42.329 00:42:42.339 reports about specific industrial
00:42:44.550 00:42:44.560 sectors and we need to stimulate R&D to
00:42:48.780 00:42:48.790 to develop and scale up the sustainable
00:42:51.960 00:42:51.970 chemical processes and we need to
00:42:54.540 00:42:54.550 establish benchmarking schemes for
00:42:58.680 00:42:58.690 energy efficiency or extend them where
00:43:01.050 00:43:01.060 they exist already we need to pursue a
00:43:05.870 00:43:05.880 effective regulatory mechanisms for
00:43:08.570 00:43:08.580 reducing co2 emissions
00:43:10.440 00:43:10.450 whether it be taxation pricing etc and
00:43:13.620 00:43:13.630 these these are more
00:43:14.550 00:43:14.560 these are broader things that apply to
00:43:16.140 00:43:16.150 other elements of the energy system as
00:43:18.000 00:43:18.010 well and we need to require industry to
00:43:21.510 00:43:21.520 meet stringent air quality standards
00:43:23.550 00:43:23.560 like those of the World Health
00:43:24.390 00:43:24.400 Organization and and also ensure that
00:43:28.710 00:43:28.720 fuel and feedstock prices reflect their
00:43:30.720 00:43:30.730 actual market value and there there's
00:43:34.860 00:43:34.870 some of the externalities that are
00:43:36.300 00:43:36.310 associated with using them as opposed to
00:43:38.070 00:43:38.080 other feedstocks and then more to do
00:43:42.960 00:43:42.970 with the use and disposal of chemical
00:43:45.090 00:43:45.100 products and these are perhaps less
00:43:47.580 00:43:47.590 familiar sorry I've skipped one slide
00:43:49.410 00:43:49.420 there M so we've got things like
00:43:51.480 00:43:51.490 reducing reliance on single-use plastics
00:43:53.610 00:43:53.620 other than for non essential non
00:43:55.740 00:43:55.750 substitutable purposes in very important
00:44:00.030 00:44:00.040 that one number seven about improving
00:44:01.890 00:44:01.900 waste management infrastructure both to
00:44:04.580 00:44:04.590 enable the great dramatic increases in
00:44:06.960 00:44:06.970 recycling that take place in the CTS but
00:44:08.880 00:44:08.890 also the added benefits of reducing
00:44:11.700 00:44:11.710 plastic leakage raising consumer
00:44:15.810 00:44:15.820 awareness about recycling and other
00:44:17.760 00:44:17.770 important demand side measures and
00:44:20.660 00:44:20.670 designing products and incentivizing
00:44:23.160 00:44:23.170 designers to design products with
00:44:25.290 00:44:25.300 disposal in mind so making them easier
00:44:27.000 00:44:27.010 to recycle easier to collect and then
00:44:29.780 00:44:29.790 initiatives to extend producer
00:44:31.770 00:44:31.780 responsibility incentives to extend
00:44:34.520 00:44:34.530 business models and other schemes that
00:44:37.290 00:44:37.300 extend the producers responsibility
00:44:39.620 00:44:39.630 beyond the factory gate and that's it my
00:44:44.760 00:44:44.770 conclusions are there but I don't think
00:44:46.620 00:44:46.630 I'm going to read these out these are
00:44:47.730 00:44:47.740 more or less the high-level themes of
00:44:49.890 00:44:49.900 the talk so we can leave those up there
00:44:51.480 00:44:51.490 for discussion thank you very much
00:44:59.030 00:44:59.040 thanks so much Peter that was was really
00:45:01.559 00:45:01.569 interesting again for those watching
00:45:03.450 00:45:03.460 online and listening to the podcast my
00:45:05.760 00:45:05.770 name is Katherine Spector and I'm here
00:45:07.740 00:45:07.750 with Peter Levi energy analyst at IEA
00:45:10.950 00:45:10.960 and Co lead author of this report that
00:45:13.260 00:45:13.270 we've been discussing the IEA report in
00:45:15.510 00:45:15.520 the future petrochemicals we're also
00:45:17.069 00:45:17.079 going to be come on up Jason we're gonna
00:45:20.099 00:45:20.109 be joined by Jason board aauggh who is
00:45:22.650 00:45:22.660 of course our founding director of the
00:45:24.390 00:45:24.400 center on global energy policy I would
00:45:31.559 00:45:31.569 just like to remind any of you who may
00:45:35.579 00:45:35.589 have questions if you're in the audience
00:45:37.190 00:45:37.200 we're gonna do a little discussion here
00:45:39.180 00:45:39.190 first but a Q&A time please feel free to
00:45:41.460 00:45:41.470 come on up to the microphone and for
00:45:44.130 00:45:44.140 those of you watching online again you
00:45:45.630 00:45:45.640 can use the hashtag cge key events to
00:45:49.410 00:45:49.420 ask a question or our twitter handle at
00:45:51.680 00:45:51.690 columbia you energy to ask a question if
00:45:54.900 00:45:54.910 you are not in the room
00:45:57.120 00:45:57.130 I mean join me at the table I think but
00:46:00.960 00:46:00.970 Jason just speaking can I ask you to
00:46:02.730 00:46:02.740 just share your thoughts on this report
00:46:05.910 00:46:05.920 and the future of petrochemicals yeah
00:46:08.819 00:46:08.829 well sure this is great I appreciate the
00:46:10.940 00:46:10.950 Peters being here and the work the IEA
00:46:13.680 00:46:13.690 did on this I think it's a really
00:46:14.609 00:46:14.619 important question I don't have unique
00:46:16.620 00:46:16.630 insights into the answer about the
00:46:18.120 00:46:18.130 future of petrochemicals but I think
00:46:19.380 00:46:19.390 it's really an important piece of work
00:46:21.270 00:46:21.280 because I don't think that the role of
00:46:23.190 00:46:23.200 petrochemicals play in the co2 mix is
00:46:26.400 00:46:26.410 often well understood and in the outlook
00:46:28.470 00:46:28.480 for oil demand is often well understood
00:46:30.599 00:46:30.609 and those two things don't necessarily
00:46:32.880 00:46:32.890 line up one to one in petrochemicals the
00:46:35.760 00:46:35.770 way they do when we think about oil use
00:46:37.829 00:46:37.839 when it's combusted in the
00:46:39.059 00:46:39.069 transportation sector so I think that's
00:46:41.640 00:46:41.650 and that's something that we're at the
00:46:43.170 00:46:43.180 energy center focused on antwuan half
00:46:45.990 00:46:46.000 just walked in who is our resident oil
00:46:50.240 00:46:50.250 market expert at the center and is doing
00:46:52.859 00:46:52.869 a lot of work with Katherine and with
00:46:54.240 00:46:54.250 Mary and Colin some others on the future
00:46:55.890 00:46:55.900 of oil demand and that is a pretty huge
00:46:58.770 00:46:58.780 ly important question for the climate
00:47:00.539 00:47:00.549 for oil markets and gets I think
00:47:03.059 00:47:03.069 sometimes superficial treatment because
00:47:05.789 00:47:05.799 people get quite understandably and
00:47:08.190 00:47:08.200 rightfully excited about some of
00:47:09.630 00:47:09.640 progress we've seen with electric
00:47:11.819 00:47:11.829 vehicles still quite a small share of
00:47:13.950 00:47:13.960 the total so even small very large
00:47:16.380 00:47:16.390 growth rates take a long time to make a
00:47:18.690 00:47:18.700 dent but then of course in passenger
00:47:22.650 00:47:22.660 vehicles are still only 20 or 25% of
00:47:24.839 00:47:24.849 global oil demand so thinking about how
00:47:26.700 00:47:26.710 it looks in Freight or in maritime or in
00:47:29.880 00:47:29.890 aviation or in petrochemicals is really
00:47:31.950 00:47:31.960 important and that looks very different
00:47:33.269 00:47:33.279 in different parts of the world so I
00:47:34.470 00:47:34.480 think there's a really valuable
00:47:35.359 00:47:35.369 contribution I just want to make sure I
00:47:38.660 00:47:38.670 and so the takeaway from that I presume
00:47:41.039 00:47:41.049 Peter is if people were to see numbers
00:47:44.849 00:47:44.859 that show like a 5 hypothetically if we
00:47:47.670 00:47:47.680 were to see very rapid growth of
00:47:48.809 00:47:48.819 electric vehicles or something and you
00:47:50.190 00:47:50.200 said well we're gonna see a 5 million
00:47:51.569 00:47:51.579 barrel a day decline and oil demand as a
00:47:54.000 00:47:54.010 result of the expansion of electric
00:47:55.349 00:47:55.359 vehicle and a 5 million barrel a day
00:47:57.240 00:47:57.250 growth because we're seeing rapid growth
00:47:59.910 00:47:59.920 in the use of petrochemicals the
00:48:02.309 00:48:02.319 immediate reaction might be well we
00:48:03.539 00:48:03.549 haven't made any progress at all and in
00:48:05.160 00:48:05.170 fact we would have from a co2 standpoint
00:48:07.019 00:48:07.029 want to make sure that's correct - right
00:48:12.029 00:48:12.039 no and yeah that I mean that is correct
00:48:15.690 00:48:15.700 I think it's I think it's important
00:48:17.309 00:48:17.319 though that we don't say that embedding
00:48:23.190 00:48:23.200 oil in in petrochemicals is 100% good we
00:48:26.549 00:48:26.559 have emissions that take place in the
00:48:28.589 00:48:28.599 chemical sector that do stem from
00:48:30.269 00:48:30.279 feedstock side process emissions
00:48:31.730 00:48:31.740 although these are relatively small
00:48:33.660 00:48:33.670 compared to the complete combustion of
00:48:35.700 00:48:35.710 the fuels in the transport sector and
00:48:37.200 00:48:37.210 then we also have these other pollution
00:48:39.089 00:48:39.099 problems there sure yeah yeah those are
00:48:41.789 00:48:41.799 really important I want to know my we
00:48:43.049 00:48:43.059 should we understand like what problem
00:48:44.339 00:48:44.349 we're addressing and what problem we're
00:48:45.960 00:48:45.970 looking at and when you but for you you
00:48:49.589 00:48:49.599 had you should process emissions and you
00:48:51.029 00:48:51.039 showed energy related emissions so if we
00:48:53.039 00:48:53.049 were to see progress in decarbonizing
00:48:54.720 00:48:54.730 the energy system
00:48:56.099 00:48:56.109 that presumably would change how we
00:48:58.950 00:48:58.960 think about the co2 impact of growth and
00:49:02.519 00:49:02.529 petrochemicals and what that would mean
00:49:05.069 00:49:05.079 for the future of oil demand and yes so
00:49:08.849 00:49:08.859 well I mean so the the energy related
00:49:11.130 00:49:11.140 and process emissions that are a data
00:49:15.089 00:49:15.099 shown on the on the chart are those that
00:49:18.390 00:49:18.400 take place directly within the
00:49:19.589 00:49:19.599 petrochemical sector so those those are
00:49:22.019 00:49:22.029 not from
00:49:22.980 00:49:22.990 Christie there's a there's a direct
00:49:24.840 00:49:24.850 emissions within the chemical sector and
00:49:26.430 00:49:26.440 a lot of those are from high temperature
00:49:28.859 00:49:28.869 heat which is another challenging aspect
00:49:31.170 00:49:31.180 of of decarbonisation that we've facing
00:49:33.990 00:49:34.000 in in lots of industries but the
00:49:35.460 00:49:35.470 chemical sectors no exception there and
00:49:38.310 00:49:38.320 then the process emissions if you're
00:49:40.140 00:49:40.150 using a fossil fuel feedstock and you're
00:49:42.450 00:49:42.460 producing something with a lower carbon
00:49:44.370 00:49:44.380 balance than what you put into it it's
00:49:47.030 00:49:47.040 relatively it's difficult to get to get
00:49:49.890 00:49:49.900 rid of those with the laws of
00:49:51.390 00:49:51.400 stoichiometry
00:49:52.140 00:49:52.150 but you've you've got obviously
00:49:55.130 00:49:55.140 important measures that you can take
00:49:57.780 00:49:57.790 with CC us and the other things we do
00:49:59.550 00:49:59.560 which is why you look at CC us right
00:50:03.230 00:50:03.240 solution and then you showed a chart
00:50:04.950 00:50:04.960 she's trying to find it but you had one
00:50:06.780 00:50:06.790 that showed like the different pathways
00:50:08.640 00:50:08.650 in the sustainable scenario and what the
00:50:12.510 00:50:12.520 sustainable development scenario or
00:50:14.100 00:50:14.110 clean technology the decline the very
00:50:21.510 00:50:21.520 steep decline in water pollution
00:50:23.250 00:50:23.260 relative to what it would otherwise look
00:50:24.870 00:50:24.880 like decline in air pollution and then
00:50:28.680 00:50:28.690 in co2
00:50:29.490 00:50:29.500 I was just wondering in that scenario
00:50:31.680 00:50:31.690 what does oil demand look like in that
00:50:34.220 00:50:34.230 clean technology scenario does that make
00:50:37.020 00:50:37.030 sense yes so because it's not gonna
00:50:38.730 00:50:38.740 decline as steeply I think sorry they
00:50:42.120 00:50:42.130 well oil demands you show the growth in
00:50:44.880 00:50:44.890 oil demand in the pet chem sector yeah
00:50:46.530 00:50:46.540 and in the clean technology scenario
00:50:48.840 00:50:48.850 what happens to the growth of oil
00:50:50.700 00:50:50.710 how much does achieving that clean
00:50:52.920 00:50:52.930 technology scenario affect oil demand in
00:50:56.670 00:50:56.680 the petrochemical sector or are we
00:50:59.400 00:50:59.410 achieving through through CC us and and
00:51:03.150 00:51:03.160 and and other things and you obviously
00:51:04.230 00:51:04.240 have embedded carbon as part of oil
00:51:05.880 00:51:05.890 demand do we still see actually it
00:51:07.830 00:51:07.840 doesn't hit oil demand that much to
00:51:10.050 00:51:10.060 achieve the clean technology scenario
00:51:11.640 00:51:11.650 does that make sense yes sorry and so
00:51:14.609 00:51:14.619 the key the key difference in oil demand
00:51:17.460 00:51:17.470 for the petrochemical sector between the
00:51:19.620 00:51:19.630 two scenarios between the reference
00:51:20.849 00:51:20.859 technologies now in the clean scenario
00:51:23.010 00:51:23.020 clean technology scenario is the the
00:51:25.290 00:51:25.300 impact of recycling on reducing demand
00:51:27.420 00:51:27.430 for primary chemicals we assume the same
00:51:29.760 00:51:29.770 demand for plastic materials but the way
00:51:32.490 00:51:32.500 they're produced requires fewer primary
00:51:35.160 00:51:35.170 chemicals and there
00:51:36.190 00:51:36.200 or less oil uses feedstock you'd still
00:51:38.890 00:51:38.900 see growth in oil demand for
00:51:41.020 00:51:41.030 petrochemicals in the clean technologies
00:51:42.609 00:51:42.619 yes we do I think at the exact figure I
00:51:45.700 00:51:45.710 don't want every quite it wrong but it's
00:51:47.290 00:51:47.300 shown on on one of the charts earlier in
00:51:49.300 00:51:49.310 the presentation ok sorry no no no it's
00:51:52.690 00:51:52.700 like I said I remember the growth in the
00:51:54.490 00:51:54.500 reference case I think was 3.6 yeah
00:51:56.319 00:51:56.329 absolutely there is still still growth
00:51:58.450 00:51:58.460 and then it's its share in the global
00:52:01.990 00:52:02.000 oil demand as shown on the on the
00:52:03.730 00:52:03.740 right-hand axis and so there we're
00:52:06.099 00:52:06.109 looking at around 15 million barrels per
00:52:07.900 00:52:07.910 day in 2050 from around at 13 today
00:52:11.579 00:52:11.589 right and sorry this just to clarify
00:52:14.470 00:52:14.480 that this is feedstock so we're looking
00:52:16.750 00:52:16.760 at eleven point seven today most of the
00:52:18.910 00:52:18.920 oil that's consumed in the in sectors as
00:52:21.010 00:52:21.020 feedstock but then there's a small
00:52:22.569 00:52:22.579 amount for process energy and then I
00:52:24.220 00:52:24.230 should have worn this like jacket that I
00:52:27.130 00:52:27.140 forgot to wear that is made of recycled
00:52:28.810 00:52:28.820 plastic from Adidas and I was wondering
00:52:31.690 00:52:31.700 how much things like that matter so
00:52:33.400 00:52:33.410 everyone's upset about we're gonna ban
00:52:35.079 00:52:35.089 plastic straws and I shouldn't have a
00:52:37.060 00:52:37.070 plastic bag when I go to the grocery
00:52:38.319 00:52:38.329 store so we see the very visible things
00:52:39.970 00:52:39.980 that we can do but as you said these
00:52:41.290 00:52:41.300 chairs are made of it so we're worried
00:52:43.900 00:52:43.910 about out plastic ocean pollution and
00:52:46.120 00:52:46.130 we're taking steps that are visible to
00:52:48.609 00:52:48.619 the consumer or like straws and plastic
00:52:50.470 00:52:50.480 bags let's imagine we do all those
00:52:52.690 00:52:52.700 things does that really matter
00:52:54.480 00:52:54.490 well it certainly matters but it's
00:52:56.950 00:52:56.960 definitely it doesn't produce as big an
00:52:59.170 00:52:59.180 impact as as one might think so in there
00:53:01.690 00:53:01.700 in the clean technology scenario we have
00:53:03.700 00:53:03.710 we characterized the recycling rate as a
00:53:07.829 00:53:07.839 combination of three factors which
00:53:10.180 00:53:10.190 multiply and that's an important dynamic
00:53:12.550 00:53:12.560 of recycling this not well understood I
00:53:15.430 00:53:15.440 don't think so the first thing is how
00:53:17.530 00:53:17.540 much of the available plastic waste that
00:53:19.480 00:53:19.490 there is how much of it do you collect
00:53:21.309 00:53:21.319 and that's the main thing that's quoted
00:53:23.470 00:53:23.480 when we talk about recycling rate so
00:53:25.030 00:53:25.040 when we we see very high recycling rates
00:53:26.920 00:53:26.930 quoted in Germany Japan Korea and
00:53:29.550 00:53:29.560 usually that's referring to the
00:53:31.300 00:53:31.310 collection rate so that's factor number
00:53:33.790 00:53:33.800 one and that could theoretically be a
00:53:35.650 00:53:35.660 hundred percent of what's there simply
00:53:37.480 00:53:37.490 you'd have to do a lot of sifting a lot
00:53:39.040 00:53:39.050 of very careful sorting at the consumer
00:53:41.319 00:53:41.329 end but you could potentially get all of
00:53:43.329 00:53:43.339 it you then have the yield loss that
00:53:46.359 00:53:46.369 takes place when you recycle and at the
00:53:48.670 00:53:48.680 moment this is too
00:53:49.690 00:53:49.700 clear twenty to thirty percent of the
00:53:52.330 00:53:52.340 plastic that you collect that is that is
00:53:55.090 00:53:55.100 you know dirty needs to be washed there
00:53:57.910 00:53:57.920 needs to be melted reprocessed you lose
00:54:00.280 00:54:00.290 twenty to thirty percent of it that can
00:54:01.990 00:54:02.000 be improved but it won't be no loss in
00:54:04.750 00:54:04.760 the future we we estimate and then the
00:54:07.420 00:54:07.430 most important factor that is I don't
00:54:09.430 00:54:09.440 think well understood at all
00:54:10.750 00:54:10.760 is this the the extent to which recycled
00:54:15.220 00:54:15.230 products can displace primary products
00:54:17.820 00:54:17.830 so if when you if you recycle your PE
00:54:21.610 00:54:21.620 body is polyethylene terephthalate
00:54:23.800 00:54:23.810 and I hope and if you recycle it as is
00:54:28.090 00:54:28.100 quite commonplace into polyethylene
00:54:30.310 00:54:30.320 terephthalate fiber that's a one-time
00:54:33.010 00:54:33.020 deal so you do that once in to make your
00:54:36.250 00:54:36.260 once sure as a bracket and then and then
00:54:39.850 00:54:39.860 it's a jacket forever and fiber
00:54:41.560 00:54:41.570 recycling at the moment is very small
00:54:45.280 00:54:45.290 scale where it exists at all it's a
00:54:47.470 00:54:47.480 relatively limited Avenue for recycling
00:54:50.290 00:54:50.300 at least with current technology so so
00:54:53.380 00:54:53.390 this kind of gown cycling effect that we
00:54:55.270 00:54:55.280 get from a lot of recycling is an
00:54:57.190 00:54:57.200 important factor in that when you have
00:55:01.270 00:55:01.280 very high recycling rates this doesn't
00:55:03.250 00:55:03.260 necessarily mean huge one-for-one
00:55:05.710 00:55:05.720 displacing of oil demand used to produce
00:55:08.230 00:55:08.240 that original product I'm sorry if that
00:55:10.210 00:55:10.220 is not sure if I explain that very well
00:55:11.950 00:55:11.960 but those those three factors are
00:55:13.900 00:55:13.910 important and the fact that they they
00:55:15.460 00:55:15.470 multiply together is is I guess the way
00:55:18.850 00:55:18.860 other way to say it is like if there is
00:55:20.320 00:55:20.330 a people talk about like a backlash
00:55:23.530 00:55:23.540 against plastic pollution and that tends
00:55:26.350 00:55:26.360 to take the form of very tangible things
00:55:27.970 00:55:27.980 like straws in plastic bags I'm
00:55:29.260 00:55:29.270 oversimplifying you but if that takes if
00:55:31.690 00:55:31.700 that becomes much more widespread I see
00:55:33.610 00:55:33.620 it with students I see with my daughter
00:55:34.870 00:55:34.880 I see it and that that is gaining
00:55:37.540 00:55:37.550 traction if that becomes a norm if we
00:55:40.510 00:55:40.520 see a cultural norm where no one's gonna
00:55:42.700 00:55:42.710 people will look at you like something's
00:55:44.800 00:55:44.810 wrong with you if you take a straw in a
00:55:46.240 00:55:46.250 restaurant or a plastic bag in the store
00:55:47.860 00:55:47.870 does that have much impact on your
00:55:50.650 00:55:50.660 outlook for petrochemical demand for the
00:55:52.600 00:55:52.610 oil sector so I mean single-use plastics
00:55:56.020 00:55:56.030 is something that's used as a term that
00:55:58.060 00:55:58.070 you use to refer to those types of
00:56:00.280 00:56:00.290 applications quite a lot
00:56:01.690 00:56:01.700 and there's no clear definition of that
00:56:03.820 00:56:03.830 so whilst it you could we can definitely
00:56:06.400 00:56:06.410 envisage a world in which we we don't
00:56:08.320 00:56:08.330 use too many straws and there are lots
00:56:12.550 00:56:12.560 of other plastics that are used once
00:56:13.930 00:56:13.940 that are designed specifically because
00:56:15.580 00:56:15.590 they can be used once so you've got
00:56:17.320 00:56:17.330 medical equipment there's stuff like
00:56:19.900 00:56:19.910 that nappies and lots of things that
00:56:21.700 00:56:21.710 contain nobody's away sorry yeah and I'm
00:56:27.130 00:56:27.140 sure not all of them contain
00:56:28.240 00:56:28.250 petrochemicals but lots of products that
00:56:30.700 00:56:30.710 we would find much harder to envisage or
00:56:33.630 00:56:33.640 whimsically kind of get away from or
00:56:36.130 00:56:36.140 change our behavior with and lots of
00:56:38.470 00:56:38.480 single-use products are much harder and
00:56:40.630 00:56:40.640 also this very limited firstly data but
00:56:44.980 00:56:44.990 also even clear definition of what
00:56:47.020 00:56:47.030 single-use plastics are and you'll see
00:56:49.330 00:56:49.340 you'll see a few estimates out there we
00:56:51.130 00:56:51.140 found a couple of other and I think some
00:56:55.030 00:56:55.040 large oil companies have have made
00:56:57.220 00:56:57.230 estimates of what single-use plastic
00:56:59.260 00:56:59.270 demand will have as an impact on our
00:57:01.840 00:57:01.850 demand and but we couldn't clarify the
00:57:06.070 00:57:06.080 definition robustly enough for us to
00:57:08.020 00:57:08.030 feel comfortable putting any numbers to
00:57:10.210 00:57:10.220 that I think I've accidentally slipped
00:57:12.040 00:57:12.050 into the moderator role since it's just
00:57:13.570 00:57:13.580 a force of habit from but I'll turn it
00:57:15.960 00:57:15.970 I'll be quiet now just like to sort of
00:57:20.440 00:57:20.450 piggyback on that question about the
00:57:24.820 00:57:24.830 scope for reducing initial use as
00:57:27.610 00:57:27.620 opposed to recycling and one of the
00:57:31.330 00:57:31.340 charts that I really liked and in the
00:57:33.190 00:57:33.200 big report that was not in your
00:57:34.270 00:57:34.280 presentation was one that looked at how
00:57:38.520 00:57:38.530 both fertilizer demand and plastics
00:57:41.260 00:57:41.270 demand grows with GDP per capita and
00:57:44.650 00:57:44.660 it's not unlike charts I've seen for
00:57:47.050 00:57:47.060 other types of oil where it grows
00:57:49.420 00:57:49.430 extremely rapidly as GDP per capita
00:57:51.700 00:57:51.710 starts to grow and and continues to grow
00:57:54.820 00:57:54.830 but sort of plateaus at the very high
00:57:56.470 00:57:56.480 income levels and it looks almost sort
00:57:58.300 00:57:58.310 of logarithmic in that way so that sort
00:58:02.650 00:58:02.660 of answers the income side of the
00:58:04.450 00:58:04.460 question but when we think about initial
00:58:06.280 00:58:06.290 use again as post recycling I'm curious
00:58:09.490 00:58:09.500 if
00:58:10.020 00:58:10.030 if you evaluate given a thought to the
00:58:13.230 00:58:13.240 price sensitivity of demand whether in
00:58:16.470 00:58:16.480 the emerging world or the developed
00:58:18.510 00:58:18.520 world and I guess the sort of point of
00:58:21.930 00:58:21.940 that question would then to be if if
00:58:23.790 00:58:23.800 governments do decide that reducing
00:58:25.980 00:58:25.990 consumption particularly if single-use
00:58:27.510 00:58:27.520 plastic the policy goal would price be
00:58:30.720 00:58:30.730 an effective lever or not really this
00:58:35.460 00:58:35.470 the short answer in building demand
00:58:37.680 00:58:37.690 projections for this work is not
00:58:40.740 00:58:40.750 directly we haven't taken into account
00:58:44.180 00:58:44.190 specific induce prices for plastic
00:58:46.800 00:58:46.810 products one of the barriers to doing
00:58:49.440 00:58:49.450 that at the moment is and you mentioned
00:58:51.390 00:58:51.400 it in your introduction is that to get
00:58:54.630 00:58:54.640 two primary plastic and fertilizer
00:58:59.010 00:58:59.020 products to get even to data and
00:59:01.170 00:59:01.180 consumption of those products this is
00:59:03.060 00:59:03.070 before they're converted into consumer
00:59:06.510 00:59:06.520 products and and other things and used
00:59:08.550 00:59:08.560 as billion building materials that aside
00:59:10.710 00:59:10.720 which is another step it's very very
00:59:13.290 00:59:13.300 difficult to get decent data on the the
00:59:16.670 00:59:16.680 ngos consumption of those things
00:59:18.810 00:59:18.820 nevermind the prices at which they're
00:59:20.460 00:59:20.470 consumed I mean I'm sure there we can
00:59:23.580 00:59:23.590 make certain estimates but in terms of
00:59:26.220 00:59:26.230 making a robust estimate of elasticity's
00:59:28.770 00:59:28.780 and things like that we I'm afraid we're
00:59:30.570 00:59:30.580 we're not at that stage with with this
00:59:32.370 00:59:32.380 with this topic yet and I I feel that
00:59:36.480 00:59:36.490 that's a fairly broadly faced challenge
00:59:40.410 00:59:40.420 with this sector the the one of the
00:59:42.540 00:59:42.550 really kind of exacerbating factors on
00:59:44.820 00:59:44.830 that on the data front is the the
00:59:46.680 00:59:46.690 multiple slices of trade that take place
00:59:48.960 00:59:48.970 so you've got trade that we do take to
00:59:51.660 00:59:51.670 try and take into account the potential
00:59:53.610 00:59:53.620 for trade in the future at the primary
00:59:55.710 00:59:55.720 chemical end and we talk to quite a lot
00:59:57.390 00:59:57.400 about the various advantages that each
00:59:59.580 00:59:59.590 region will face and the potential
01:00:02.610 01:00:02.620 advantages that will provide for them as
01:00:04.710 01:00:04.720 a as an export region for instance us
01:00:07.080 01:00:07.090 middle east in the short term and and
01:00:09.450 01:00:09.460 then the domestic drivers for that
01:00:11.400 01:00:11.410 demand but then beyond their primary
01:00:14.730 01:00:14.740 chemicals that we model all of the
01:00:17.060 01:00:17.070 third-tier chemical chemicals that are
01:00:19.730 01:00:19.740 in within the chemical sector and then
01:00:21.560 01:00:21.570 the products that take that are made
01:00:23.270 01:00:23.280 outside it the trade that happens in all
01:00:26.420 01:00:26.430 at all of these levels is is phenomenal
01:00:29.630 01:00:29.640 and it's it's much more complex
01:00:32.080 01:00:32.090 potential e more complex as you go
01:00:34.280 01:00:34.290 towards the consumer so that's that's
01:00:36.770 01:00:36.780 our that's my excuse yeah it's it's
01:00:40.490 01:00:40.500 tremendously challenging data wise I
01:00:42.200 01:00:42.210 wonder if given the sort of mainstream
01:00:45.920 01:00:45.930 attention to some of these issues we
01:00:47.660 01:00:47.670 might start to get some case studies I
01:00:49.640 01:00:49.650 think municipalities probably know what
01:00:52.370 01:00:52.380 their waste collection and disposal
01:00:54.350 01:00:54.360 costs are if that were somehow added as
01:00:57.740 01:00:57.750 a tax or fee at least in sort of little
01:01:02.170 01:01:02.180 microcosms we might start to be able to
01:01:04.460 01:01:04.470 measure a demand response but it is a
01:01:07.280 01:01:07.290 really overwhelming data problem it even
01:01:10.370 01:01:10.380 a national level in the u.s. let alone a
01:01:12.080 01:01:12.090 global level so that's really why this
01:01:15.080 01:01:15.090 report as a starting point was was
01:01:17.090 01:01:17.100 tremendously helpful I want to switch
01:01:20.450 01:01:20.460 over to the the feedstocks for for just
01:01:22.880 01:01:22.890 a minute because the other problem with
01:01:25.820 01:01:25.830 this sector that I find a little bit
01:01:27.590 01:01:27.600 overwhelming to wrap my head around is
01:01:29.240 01:01:29.250 what the implications are for refiners
01:01:32.530 01:01:32.540 we have a world where refiners are now
01:01:36.290 01:01:36.300 looking down the barrel of reduced at
01:01:39.740 01:01:39.750 least slower growing gasoline demand in
01:01:43.010 01:01:43.020 many cases a slower growing a reduced
01:01:46.120 01:01:46.130 heavy end residual fuel oil part of the
01:01:49.220 01:01:49.230 barrel and eventually as you set a
01:01:52.100 01:01:52.110 higher naphtha demand but in the
01:01:54.590 01:01:54.600 meanwhile the competitiveness of ethane
01:01:57.620 01:01:57.630 might might be a bit of a hurdle so what
01:02:02.750 01:02:02.760 does a refiner to do when when you start
01:02:05.630 01:02:05.640 to get these very sort of lopsided rates
01:02:08.510 01:02:08.520 of growth in the different products how
01:02:11.840 01:02:11.850 are they particularly going to get over
01:02:13.730 01:02:13.740 that hump and and adjust we see a lot of
01:02:17.750 01:02:17.760 companies and even countries sort of
01:02:19.580 01:02:19.590 saying this is where it's at for us in
01:02:22.340 01:02:22.350 terms of our future economics this is
01:02:24.110 01:02:24.120 where we're going
01:02:25.680 01:02:25.690 but if you could just maybe talk a
01:02:27.540 01:02:27.550 little bit more about the challenges
01:02:28.830 01:02:28.840 that refiners will face in the next sort
01:02:30.510 01:02:30.520 of twenty to thirty years in in making
01:02:32.310 01:02:32.320 this transition not absolutely so this
01:02:34.830 01:02:34.840 is a topic we revisit at various points
01:02:37.380 01:02:37.390 in the book and and in the in the
01:02:40.380 01:02:40.390 reference case or the baseline scenario
01:02:42.170 01:02:42.180 we we already see some of this tension
01:02:45.210 01:02:45.220 in terms of the ratio of different
01:02:47.250 01:02:47.260 weight products within the barrel
01:02:48.690 01:02:48.700 getting out of sync with what it's
01:02:50.970 01:02:50.980 traditionally been but then in the in
01:02:53.250 01:02:53.260 the clean technology scenario this
01:02:54.510 01:02:54.520 search this slide actually demonstrates
01:02:56.580 01:02:56.590 it quite well most of those most of that
01:02:58.710 01:02:58.720 blue bar most of that feedstock there is
01:03:01.100 01:03:01.110 we we have Ethan and LPG and oil
01:03:04.620 01:03:04.630 products in the ia and in our balances
01:03:06.810 01:03:06.820 and these are even lighter the naphtha
01:03:09.210 01:03:09.220 and then most of the rest is naphtha
01:03:11.160 01:03:11.170 very small amount of gas or uses
01:03:13.440 01:03:13.450 feedstock diesel and very small amounts
01:03:17.070 01:03:17.080 of heavier products so so the the the
01:03:20.060 01:03:20.070 imbalance becomes even more acute in the
01:03:22.890 01:03:22.900 in a clean technology scenario given
01:03:25.290 01:03:25.300 that gasoline diesel undergoing even
01:03:28.350 01:03:28.360 more severe decline since donation so
01:03:31.700 01:03:31.710 absolutely a key concept that we return
01:03:34.380 01:03:34.390 to and and I think the CTS dynamics are
01:03:37.350 01:03:37.360 there are the most interesting ones to
01:03:38.970 01:03:38.980 look at in terms of what the refining
01:03:41.670 01:03:41.680 industry might do about this or and
01:03:45.200 01:03:45.210 welfare one thing is the the integration
01:03:48.750 01:03:48.760 expert aspect that we touched on a bit
01:03:51.210 01:03:51.220 in the talk that on there on the
01:03:52.950 01:03:52.960 financial side as as the margins
01:03:55.130 01:03:55.140 reducing in the traditional markets and
01:03:57.800 01:03:57.810 trying to get step further down the
01:04:00.540 01:04:00.550 value chain in the pet CEM sector to try
01:04:03.480 01:04:03.490 and capture some of that margin that's
01:04:04.910 01:04:04.920 being captured by chemical companies or
01:04:07.380 01:04:07.390 only chemical chemical only companies
01:04:09.510 01:04:09.520 and so that's one thing that we already
01:04:12.660 01:04:12.670 observe happening and and then in the
01:04:15.120 01:04:15.130 longer term the the dream technology and
01:04:18.870 01:04:18.880 and in fact there is an existing plant
01:04:20.960 01:04:20.970 today of so-called crude oil two
01:04:23.850 01:04:23.860 chemicals
01:04:24.330 01:04:24.340 I was going to ask you about that means
01:04:26.010 01:04:26.020 Aramco is looking at it right and yeah
01:04:27.840 01:04:27.850 and there's a there's an I think it's
01:04:30.140 01:04:30.150 owned by run by Exxon there's a plant in
01:04:33.720 01:04:33.730 Singapore today that's
01:04:36.770 01:04:36.780 big I mean big ish 400 kilobytes per day
01:04:40.920 01:04:40.930 and and there's the extent to which this
01:04:46.799 01:04:46.809 is other technologies piece together so
01:04:50.910 01:04:50.920 bits of pet chem facilities and bits of
01:04:53.339 01:04:53.349 refineries stitch together I must
01:04:56.069 01:04:56.079 confess that on the refining technology
01:04:58.230 01:04:58.240 level we would be of great benefit to
01:05:01.559 01:05:01.569 have Araceli the other lead author of
01:05:03.660 01:05:03.670 the project here she's very experienced
01:05:05.670 01:05:05.680 in the refining industry and that the
01:05:08.280 01:05:08.290 yeah the extent to which these
01:05:09.569 01:05:09.579 technologies are and piece pieces of of
01:05:12.720 01:05:12.730 each industry stitch together and and
01:05:15.329 01:05:15.339 not a full revolution in the way that
01:05:17.940 01:05:17.950 oil is processed and leapfrogging this
01:05:20.910 01:05:20.920 this this refining step that that's
01:05:24.059 01:05:24.069 something that is set to evolve in this
01:05:27.210 01:05:27.220 or will will need to evolve further if
01:05:29.160 01:05:29.170 it's to fulfill the filfil ambition of
01:05:31.859 01:05:31.869 the of the technology which is getting
01:05:35.760 01:05:35.770 you know 70 to 80 percent yield of your
01:05:37.950 01:05:37.960 crude into chemicals and this I think
01:05:41.940 01:05:41.950 you need very light Croods to do this at
01:05:45.720 01:05:45.730 the moment or or even just I mean like
01:05:48.960 01:05:48.970 very condensate yeah so you're utilizing
01:05:52.319 01:05:52.329 things that are already much closer to
01:05:54.390 01:05:54.400 the to the feedstocks that we might be
01:05:55.980 01:05:55.990 short of later and one other components
01:05:59.730 01:05:59.740 mentioned on this front is that the the
01:06:02.000 01:06:02.010 the lighter crude supply that's coming
01:06:06.359 01:06:06.369 from the and NGOs from the shale shale
01:06:10.829 01:06:10.839 gas revolution are in to some extent and
01:06:14.089 01:06:14.099 looking like they will fill some of this
01:06:16.760 01:06:16.770 additional light product gap in the
01:06:19.740 01:06:19.750 short to medium term but as we as the we
01:06:23.910 01:06:23.920 see the ngl supply tightening in the in
01:06:27.000 01:06:27.010 the latter half of the movie and based
01:06:30.420 01:06:30.430 on current projections of output from
01:06:32.400 01:06:32.410 the US that's when the challenge will
01:06:34.650 01:06:34.660 start to really ramp up according to
01:06:37.150 01:06:37.160 I'm only sure before we open things up
01:06:41.470 01:06:41.480 to the audience Jason Giovanni okay
01:06:43.720 01:06:43.730 again if if you're in the room here
01:06:46.120 01:06:46.130 please feel free to step to the
01:06:47.529 01:06:47.539 microphone and for folks listening again
01:06:50.440 01:06:50.450 if you'd like to ask a question
01:06:53.099 01:06:53.109 virtually the hashtag to do that is si
01:06:56.020 01:06:56.030 GE P events and our twitter handle is at
01:06:58.839 01:06:58.849 Columbia Hugh Energy I would like to
01:07:06.599 01:07:06.609 thank you very much for an excellent
01:07:08.980 01:07:08.990 presentation on your report I'd like to
01:07:12.400 01:07:12.410 ask two big-picture questions one is I'm
01:07:17.770 01:07:17.780 thinking about this from the point of
01:07:19.359 01:07:19.369 view of alternatives to oil and gas and
01:07:23.160 01:07:23.170 thinking of the consuming sectors and
01:07:26.020 01:07:26.030 obviously power generation is under
01:07:29.589 01:07:29.599 attack if you will with alternatives to
01:07:31.900 01:07:31.910 what we have now whether it's renewables
01:07:34.569 01:07:34.579 or nuclear or other ideas which are
01:07:38.049 01:07:38.059 going to lower obviously they have
01:07:39.819 01:07:39.829 already lowered or deplete displaced oil
01:07:42.339 01:07:42.349 but they might even lower how much
01:07:44.740 01:07:44.750 natural gas is used the same thing with
01:07:47.109 01:07:47.119 transportation obviously with electric
01:07:48.670 01:07:48.680 vehicles etc but it seems to me that
01:07:50.710 01:07:50.720 petrochemicals doesn't have this
01:07:53.069 01:07:53.079 alternatives clear-cut economics that's
01:07:57.400 01:07:57.410 I wonder if you agree with that
01:07:59.289 01:07:59.299 long-term I'm talking about 2030 to 2050
01:08:01.900 01:08:01.910 and imposing on that I like your opinion
01:08:07.000 01:08:07.010 about especially in Europe which seems
01:08:10.450 01:08:10.460 to be going ahead with a carbon price if
01:08:13.900 01:08:13.910 you assume a modest carbon price let's
01:08:17.919 01:08:17.929 say $20 per ton of co2 or what I
01:08:21.669 01:08:21.679 consider a more realistic carbon price
01:08:23.769 01:08:23.779 which is $50 per co2 which is not
01:08:26.320 01:08:26.330 unheard of in Scandinavia which has over
01:08:28.720 01:08:28.730 almost $100 per ton today how do the
01:08:32.829 01:08:32.839 economics look for the petrochemicals
01:08:34.780 01:08:34.790 technologies the cts as well as the RTS
01:08:37.990 01:08:38.000 and the biofuels and thirdly do you see
01:08:42.610 01:08:42.620 that you made a projection about less
01:08:46.030 01:08:46.040 availability of ethane because of
01:08:48.700 01:08:48.710 natural gas
01:08:49.939 01:08:49.949 but have you taken into account
01:08:51.769 01:08:51.779 long-term the possibility that shale
01:08:56.109 01:08:56.119 technology horizontal drilling and
01:09:00.039 01:09:00.049 fracking is going to move outside the
01:09:03.589 01:09:03.599 United States in other areas that have
01:09:05.930 01:09:05.940 shale that are looking at it including
01:09:08.359 01:09:08.369 China and others and therefore more
01:09:11.089 01:09:11.099 natural gas might become available and
01:09:13.189 01:09:13.199 therefore it's going to be in
01:09:14.539 01:09:14.549 competition for both power gen as well
01:09:17.269 01:09:17.279 as potentially for petrochemicals
01:09:19.039 01:09:19.049 I wonder that those kind of long-term
01:09:21.249 01:09:21.259 views I appreciate your opinion and
01:09:24.169 01:09:24.179 definitely Jason's opinion well so a few
01:09:31.489 01:09:31.499 reflections I have to remember these
01:09:33.379 01:09:33.389 points so on the alternatives point
01:09:36.199 01:09:36.209 first and so yes there are all
01:09:38.299 01:09:38.309 sensitives and to using oil as a
01:09:40.489 01:09:40.499 feedstock for petrochemicals and natural
01:09:43.039 01:09:43.049 gas and coal theoretically any carbon
01:09:45.949 01:09:45.959 hydrogen containing compound is as the
01:09:48.859 01:09:48.869 candidate and that obvious ones are
01:09:51.529 01:09:51.539 bioenergy and then electrically
01:09:53.989 01:09:53.999 electrically electrolytic hydrogen so
01:09:57.290 01:09:57.300 water electrolysis to produce hydrogen
01:09:59.750 01:09:59.760 and then combining it with a carbon
01:10:01.520 01:10:01.530 source usually co2 and to use it to make
01:10:06.169 01:10:06.179 methanol and ammonia and those are those
01:10:08.270 01:10:08.280 are two routes that we characterize in
01:10:11.029 01:10:11.039 detail further primary chemicals in
01:10:12.799 01:10:12.809 there in the chemical sector the the
01:10:15.350 01:10:15.360 difficulty and the reason and I think
01:10:16.939 01:10:16.949 this is moving more to the second
01:10:18.620 01:10:18.630 question in the context of the broader
01:10:20.839 01:10:20.849 energy system and the chemical sector
01:10:23.000 01:10:23.010 playing its role within that the reason
01:10:25.879 01:10:25.889 why these technologies don't see as much
01:10:29.330 01:10:29.340 penetration given a level of carbon
01:10:32.270 01:10:32.280 price or a broader context in which they
01:10:34.339 01:10:34.349 they might be more you know more
01:10:36.529 01:10:36.539 appealing to the to the modeling choices
01:10:38.449 01:10:38.459 and more appealing among the modeling
01:10:41.600 01:10:41.610 choices
01:10:42.109 01:10:42.119 the reason before that is that CC u.s.
01:10:44.449 01:10:44.459 is able to reduce the emissions keep the
01:10:47.120 01:10:47.130 oil feedstock that is comparatively
01:10:49.160 01:10:49.170 cheaper in a in a low lower carbon world
01:10:52.069 01:10:52.079 when are there where other sectors are
01:10:54.560 01:10:54.570 moving away from it its able to utilize
01:10:56.989 01:10:56.999 this feedstock
01:10:57.739 01:10:57.749 capture it at relatively low cost and
01:10:59.770 01:10:59.780 and
01:11:01.370 01:11:01.380 send it for transportation and storage
01:11:03.410 01:11:03.420 so of the scalable long-term
01:11:06.530 01:11:06.540 alternatives that's the one that
01:11:08.149 01:11:08.159 according to our modeling at the moment
01:11:09.500 01:11:09.510 wins out with a lower with a lower
01:11:11.930 01:11:11.940 electricity price potentially with you
01:11:15.290 01:11:15.300 know very low electricity prices from
01:11:18.350 01:11:18.360 surplus electricity or maybe form
01:11:20.780 01:11:20.790 stranded renewable assets so we're
01:11:22.850 01:11:22.860 looking at that at the moment as well if
01:11:24.950 01:11:24.960 you had super low electricity prices
01:11:26.810 01:11:26.820 then these roots can become competitive
01:11:29.060 01:11:29.070 and we actually produced a graph towards
01:11:32.750 01:11:32.760 the end of the report where we do this
01:11:34.189 01:11:34.199 off off CTS analysis where we look at
01:11:37.450 01:11:37.460 for full electricity prices right down
01:11:40.669 01:11:40.679 to their ten to twenty euros a megawatt
01:11:42.229 01:11:42.239 hour which which of these technologies
01:11:45.560 01:11:45.570 are competing what cost and for a given
01:11:48.260 01:11:48.270 set of gas prices and feed stock prices
01:11:51.560 01:11:51.570 for bioenergy so that I hope I've
01:11:54.439 01:11:54.449 answered a couple of the they're first
01:11:56.120 01:11:56.130 ones with with that on the ethane and
01:12:00.320 01:12:00.330 LPG and well NGOs in general supply
01:12:03.649 01:12:03.659 I think Jason probably would like to
01:12:06.110 01:12:06.120 wear this for longer than me but and the
01:12:09.200 01:12:09.210 NGO supply that we see in the US it
01:12:11.240 01:12:11.250 comes from the the broader modeling that
01:12:13.129 01:12:13.139 we do have different gas fields and oil
01:12:15.649 01:12:15.659 fields around the world we have
01:12:16.820 01:12:16.830 colleagues on the supply side who we
01:12:18.620 01:12:18.630 look at all of those fields individually
01:12:20.540 01:12:20.550 I believe they look at trade they look
01:12:22.790 01:12:22.800 at likely yields and that kind of thing
01:12:24.800 01:12:24.810 and and the the supply of ngl
01:12:29.240 01:12:29.250 specifically the the dampening effect or
01:12:31.640 01:12:31.650 the lower lowering of relative supply
01:12:34.640 01:12:34.650 despite continuing natural gas
01:12:36.470 01:12:36.480 production from these assets and fields
01:12:39.080 01:12:39.090 is because as the shale gas operations
01:12:43.850 01:12:43.860 move to fields the further along the
01:12:48.410 01:12:48.420 supply curve they are yet drier so
01:12:52.040 01:12:52.050 they're fewer NGOs in the in the gas
01:12:54.050 01:12:54.060 stream that's that's my understanding of
01:12:55.459 01:12:55.469 it and and that's where this flattening
01:12:58.310 01:12:58.320 supply of Ethan and LPG comes in in the
01:13:01.459 01:13:01.469 in the modeling and I assume I assume
01:13:02.810 01:13:02.820 that a fairly
01:13:03.979 01:13:03.989 is modeled within the other regions as
01:13:07.220 01:13:07.230 well that where --shelves --shelves
01:13:09.169 01:13:09.179 looked at but I might refer you to their
01:13:12.890 01:13:12.900 supply colleagues and on the World
01:13:14.959 01:13:14.969 Energy Outlook site for a detailed
01:13:16.580 01:13:16.590 discussion of that topic there were a
01:13:19.040 01:13:19.050 lot of pieces to the question so I don't
01:13:21.439 01:13:21.449 may have lost the thread but I and just
01:13:25.069 01:13:25.079 make a point you asked about co2 pricing
01:13:27.109 01:13:27.119 and the impact that it would have and so
01:13:29.120 01:13:29.130 I think there's a question which is what
01:13:30.649 01:13:30.659 impact a given co2 price would have on
01:13:32.810 01:13:32.820 the competitiveness of it and you may
01:13:34.430 01:13:34.440 have thoughts about that in your
01:13:36.379 01:13:36.389 modeling one point I would make I think
01:13:38.930 01:13:38.940 is important to keep in mind is the kind
01:13:41.509 01:13:41.519 of political economy of carbon pricing
01:13:43.939 01:13:43.949 and how we actually see carbon prices
01:13:46.370 01:13:46.380 get implemented and designed both to
01:13:48.109 01:13:48.119 build political support and because
01:13:50.209 01:13:50.219 almost any carbon price regime is likely
01:13:53.660 01:13:53.670 to have border adjustments built into it
01:13:55.669 01:13:55.679 to protect the competitiveness of the
01:13:57.140 01:13:57.150 manufacturing sector petrochemicals
01:13:58.850 01:13:58.860 would be one that would be seen as very
01:14:00.709 01:14:00.719 vulnerable to being undermined by a
01:14:02.989 01:14:02.999 carbon price if your competitors
01:14:04.339 01:14:04.349 overseas we're not paying a similar
01:14:05.779 01:14:05.789 carbon price so I I think it's in in
01:14:08.750 01:14:08.760 terms of your policy recommendations I
01:14:10.729 01:14:10.739 see the petrochemical sector as tell me
01:14:13.850 01:14:13.860 if you agree being one of the more
01:14:16.459 01:14:16.469 difficult ones to actually impose a
01:14:18.259 01:14:18.269 carbon price on because it's always
01:14:19.759 01:14:19.769 gonna get a cup caught up in this trade
01:14:22.100 01:14:22.110 and competitiveness argument that's
01:14:23.359 01:14:23.369 likely to mean even countries that move
01:14:25.220 01:14:25.230 forward or States or whatever with a
01:14:26.720 01:14:26.730 carbon price may end up actually
01:14:29.239 01:14:29.249 exempting large segments of of the
01:14:33.140 01:14:33.150 manufacturing sector that could include
01:14:34.609 01:14:34.619 petrochemicals we've seen that where
01:14:36.560 01:14:36.570 petricka where carbon pricing has been
01:14:38.089 01:14:38.099 implemented so far I think you asked
01:14:40.549 01:14:40.559 about shale outside the US as well and I
01:14:43.609 01:14:43.619 think that I mean we know the resource
01:14:46.549 01:14:46.559 is there there's not in shale is not
01:14:48.589 01:14:48.599 unique to the US by any means there of
01:14:50.209 01:14:50.219 course more challenges with
01:14:51.229 01:14:51.239 infrastructure and water availability
01:14:52.640 01:14:52.650 and private land ownership and other
01:14:54.109 01:14:54.119 things but given the right incentives I
01:14:57.379 01:14:57.389 think we're already seeing it developed
01:14:58.939 01:14:58.949 in black America in in Argentina and it
01:15:01.970 01:15:01.980 will get developed elsewhere there's
01:15:04.459 01:15:04.469 also some benefit to it because it's
01:15:06.049 01:15:06.059 more short cycle in nature and as their
01:15:07.910 01:15:07.920 attendant be continued to be growing
01:15:09.319 01:15:09.329 concerns about a long term oil demand
01:15:10.819 01:15:10.829 growth there's a some desirability we
01:15:13.729 01:15:13.739 see in the part of the industry which is
01:15:15.169 01:15:15.179 increasingly shifting capital towards
01:15:17.239 01:15:17.249 things that are
01:15:17.870 01:15:17.880 cycle shell might become more attractive
01:15:19.310 01:15:19.320 for that reason I would just add on the
01:15:23.240 01:15:23.250 on the industry kind of carbon leakage
01:15:25.240 01:15:25.250 point that for sure that's something
01:15:28.220 01:15:28.230 that we we hear from industry
01:15:30.200 01:15:30.210 stakeholders but not just in the
01:15:31.790 01:15:31.800 petrochemical industry but in the engage
01:15:34.580 01:15:34.590 on five energy intensive sub sectors in
01:15:37.879 01:15:37.889 specifically in the technology division
01:15:40.430 01:15:40.440 pulp and paper cement iron and steel
01:15:42.649 01:15:42.659 aluminium and and chemicals and this is
01:15:45.649 01:15:45.659 a relatively common theme that people
01:15:49.129 01:15:49.139 with industries with relatively older
01:15:53.229 01:15:53.239 assets in places like Europe with the
01:15:55.970 01:15:55.980 most likely integration of of some of
01:15:59.270 01:15:59.280 these policies and say that well you
01:16:02.780 01:16:02.790 know if we have to rebuild these plants
01:16:04.280 01:16:04.290 there it won't be here and that kind of
01:16:06.800 01:16:06.810 message coming through and against that
01:16:09.470 01:16:09.480 policy push but it's it's obviously hard
01:16:13.970 01:16:13.980 to predict what were the adjustments and
01:16:16.100 01:16:16.110 kind of policy compensations would be
01:16:18.200 01:16:18.210 put in place for for those kind of
01:16:20.919 01:16:20.929 adjustments
01:16:22.770 01:16:22.780 I think mark may have had a question
01:16:24.419 01:16:24.429 someone more knowledgeable than us mark
01:16:28.470 01:16:28.480 Schwartz Platts analytics a very very
01:16:30.510 01:16:30.520 interesting talk and very important
01:16:31.919 01:16:31.929 topic we come to almost exactly the same
01:16:34.500 01:16:34.510 conclusions about the importance of
01:16:36.680 01:16:36.690 petrochemicals I think you mentioned the
01:16:39.359 01:16:39.369 term cost-effective recycling so I'm
01:16:42.899 01:16:42.909 wondering in a study you know have did
01:16:45.209 01:16:45.219 you take a look at the economics of
01:16:46.859 01:16:46.869 recycling versus primary plastics
01:16:49.770 01:16:49.780 production where do we see
01:16:51.629 01:16:51.639 cost-effective recycling today what's it
01:16:54.330 01:16:54.340 going to take to get there is the market
01:16:57.120 01:16:57.130 going to get there do they need a little
01:16:58.319 01:16:58.329 help from carbon fees and other other
01:17:00.419 01:17:00.429 fees on one-time use what can you say
01:17:03.000 01:17:03.010 about the economics so the investment
01:17:06.510 01:17:06.520 numbers it's important to clarify refer
01:17:08.879 01:17:08.889 only to primary chemical production so
01:17:10.799 01:17:10.809 when when we are talking about recycling
01:17:13.529 01:17:13.539 there were the secondary process
01:17:15.779 01:17:15.789 equipment that's not included within
01:17:17.339 01:17:17.349 those within those figures which does
01:17:19.319 01:17:19.329 lead to a bit of a distorting effect in
01:17:23.520 01:17:23.530 terms of the investment and but they're
01:17:25.919 01:17:25.929 very expensive assets upstream and
01:17:28.229 01:17:28.239 producing primary chemicals are an
01:17:29.850 01:17:29.860 important consideration in terms of
01:17:33.359 01:17:33.369 their economics of one versus the other
01:17:35.580 01:17:35.590 I think this this very much depends on
01:17:37.470 01:17:37.480 the type of recycling on the plastics
01:17:39.450 01:17:39.460 front I've assumed your friend too and
01:17:41.580 01:17:41.590 and so we've I mean maybe you've got
01:17:45.060 01:17:45.070 three main types as we characterize it
01:17:47.339 01:17:47.349 in the report and more generally
01:17:49.020 01:17:49.030 mechanical chemical and then back to
01:17:51.299 01:17:51.309 feedstock and and as as far as I am
01:17:55.950 01:17:55.960 aware the the chemical and back to
01:17:58.319 01:17:58.329 feedstock level recycling is at
01:18:00.899 01:18:00.909 demonstration phase and relatively early
01:18:04.129 01:18:04.139 on in the development stage of really it
01:18:07.799 01:18:07.809 not not many processes brought to market
01:18:10.169 01:18:10.179 as far as we're aware mechanical
01:18:12.660 01:18:12.670 recycling well-established can be cost
01:18:15.689 01:18:15.699 effective if there's the right
01:18:17.040 01:18:17.050 incentives and if a lot of the
01:18:18.779 01:18:18.789 collection and sorting processes are are
01:18:22.830 01:18:22.840 handled or taken care of by the
01:18:24.240 01:18:24.250 municipality or by a third party I think
01:18:27.779 01:18:27.789 I mean for p84 recycled polyethylene
01:18:31.229 01:18:31.239 terephthalate these
01:18:34.490 01:18:34.500 the chips have a have a market price and
01:18:36.950 01:18:36.960 when oil prices are high some producers
01:18:40.160 01:18:40.170 I think switch to larger chunks of
01:18:42.770 01:18:42.780 secondary production so in specific
01:18:44.600 01:18:44.610 market segments as far as I'm aware
01:18:46.700 01:18:46.710 there are there are aspects of already
01:18:49.729 01:18:49.739 kind of cost competitive elements to to
01:18:52.550 01:18:52.560 recycled and secondary plastic
01:18:54.380 01:18:54.390 production but nothing like the scale
01:18:57.110 01:18:57.120 that we we need this is it's as far as
01:18:59.990 01:19:00.000 I'm aware the the most recycled plastic
01:19:02.270 01:19:02.280 resin is is PE T and it's because it has
01:19:04.220 01:19:04.230 a high value application that can be
01:19:06.560 01:19:06.570 recirculated and it has this big
01:19:08.570 01:19:08.580 downcycling
01:19:09.970 01:19:09.980 opportunity to fiber which is a huge
01:19:13.220 01:19:13.230 huge market that then has no recycling
01:19:15.080 01:19:15.090 associated with it so I think in
01:19:16.610 01:19:16.620 specific segments we use in specific
01:19:19.189 01:19:19.199 aspect elements of the cycle you can see
01:19:21.920 01:19:21.930 some cost competitiveness but I think in
01:19:24.050 01:19:24.060 the in the full gamut of recycling
01:19:27.500 01:19:27.510 options you see relatively limited cost
01:19:30.140 01:19:30.150 effectiveness that's my you know just a
01:19:38.810 01:19:38.820 question on that top-down analysis looks
01:19:41.000 01:19:41.010 just introduced oh yeah sure forgot that
01:19:42.650 01:19:42.660 mark as you said I just jumped down so
01:19:44.510 01:19:44.520 Terry Vishwanath I'm with SNP analytics
01:19:47.000 01:19:47.010 so just a quick question on the on the
01:19:49.580 01:19:49.590 top-down analysis you know I think that
01:19:51.650 01:19:51.660 chart was really great you talked about
01:19:52.939 01:19:52.949 the difference between industrialized
01:19:54.410 01:19:54.420 versus emerging nations the 22 you know
01:19:57.530 01:19:57.540 20 to 1 and then the 10 to 1 and
01:19:59.479 01:19:59.489 fertilizers we've seen some changes
01:20:02.240 01:20:02.250 occur within these components so for
01:20:04.100 01:20:04.110 example over the last 4 years you know
01:20:07.280 01:20:07.290 China has actually decreased their
01:20:09.430 01:20:09.440 percent of fertilizer application per
01:20:11.780 01:20:11.790 crop 15 percent each year 2014 to 2018
01:20:14.689 01:20:14.699 you're seeing a shift occur within these
01:20:16.760 01:20:16.770 segments can we assume all size fits one
01:20:19.189 01:20:19.199 when we think about doing that analysis
01:20:21.140 01:20:21.150 because we you know we all kind of
01:20:22.189 01:20:22.199 juggle with it but what do you think no
01:20:25.220 01:20:25.230 absolutely I think this especially on
01:20:27.050 01:20:27.060 the fertilizer front the nitrogenous
01:20:29.000 01:20:29.010 fertilizers is significant gain still to
01:20:32.180 01:20:32.190 be made on the on the efficiency in the
01:20:34.610 01:20:34.620 application efficiency front has been
01:20:36.500 01:20:36.510 lots of academic papers written about
01:20:38.630 01:20:38.640 this in the past but I think this is
01:20:39.890 01:20:39.900 really gaining traction in the more in
01:20:41.930 01:20:41.940 the policy sphere and
01:20:43.399 01:20:43.409 the technology sphere and so perhaps
01:20:47.449 01:20:47.459 these multipliers won't come to their
01:20:49.310 01:20:49.320 full fruition of multiplying every per
01:20:53.270 01:20:53.280 capita demand in African countries and
01:20:55.879 01:20:55.889 other and Indians and so on by by five
01:20:59.929 01:20:59.939 or twenty or ten but I mean if some
01:21:02.479 01:21:02.489 small degree of that occurs there's this
01:21:05.120 01:21:05.130 that still spells a relatively strong
01:21:08.149 01:21:08.159 growth trajectory for countries in which
01:21:11.089 01:21:11.099 the per capita figures for was plastics
01:21:14.479 01:21:14.489 especially as where it's more acute are
01:21:16.339 01:21:16.349 really in the kind of single-digit
01:21:18.409 01:21:18.419 kilogram figures according to the the
01:21:20.330 01:21:20.340 data we have I mean we would definitely
01:21:24.020 01:21:24.030 like to have a look at some of the
01:21:26.419 01:21:26.429 figures you're talking about for and for
01:21:28.909 01:21:28.919 those some of the more detailed case
01:21:30.529 01:21:30.539 studies because I mean again we find on
01:21:34.399 01:21:34.409 in the in the public sector in the
01:21:36.560 01:21:36.570 public realm data on on detailed stuff
01:21:39.679 01:21:39.689 like this about yields of crops from
01:21:42.830 01:21:42.840 particular fertilizers we have a good
01:21:44.689 01:21:44.699 relationship with the international
01:21:46.069 01:21:46.079 fertilizer Association who who were
01:21:49.009 01:21:49.019 kindly supported us analytically through
01:21:52.759 01:21:52.769 various aspects of data gathering and so
01:21:55.040 01:21:55.050 on and but I mean the the public realm
01:21:58.520 01:21:58.530 data for for this topic is is very hard
01:22:01.699 01:22:01.709 for us to get the high-resolution data
01:22:03.859 01:22:03.869 to do some of the things that Katherine
01:22:06.229 01:22:06.239 mentioned that we would be great to look
01:22:08.540 01:22:08.550 at
01:22:09.169 01:22:09.179 you know price sensitivity and
01:22:10.790 01:22:10.800 ethnicities and and so on but I think
01:22:13.759 01:22:13.769 that chart for sure is at a high level
01:22:16.159 01:22:16.169 it's meant to draw home their kind of
01:22:19.359 01:22:19.369 wider potential if even some of that
01:22:22.959 01:22:22.969 equalizing in per capita demand came to
01:22:25.370 01:22:25.380 came to fruition thanks Peter
01:22:29.089 01:22:29.099 I am conscious at the time so I I think
01:22:31.729 01:22:31.739 maybe we'll just end with one final
01:22:33.560 01:22:33.570 question you know if you were to do a
01:22:36.140 01:22:36.150 part of this report are there any topics
01:22:41.149 01:22:41.159 that you think merit further research
01:22:42.909 01:22:42.919 understanding of course the myriad data
01:22:45.169 01:22:45.179 limitations that we're dealing with what
01:22:48.799 01:22:48.809 didn't make the cut here that you think
01:22:50.270 01:22:50.280 is still interesting to look at
01:22:52.590 01:22:52.600 well I would definitely like to do more
01:22:56.740 01:22:56.750 in this topic personally I said it's a
01:22:58.390 01:22:58.400 great interest of mine and I think it
01:23:00.490 01:23:00.500 for several analysts at the agency so
01:23:03.010 01:23:03.020 we're we're definitely primed if there's
01:23:04.660 01:23:04.670 appetite for it and the reception for
01:23:07.810 01:23:07.820 this publication will certainly be a big
01:23:11.340 01:23:11.350 factor in whether that comes about and
01:23:14.310 01:23:14.320 but I think some of the aspects that
01:23:17.680 01:23:17.690 we've touched on in the discussion are
01:23:19.900 01:23:19.910 really where I think the most
01:23:21.700 01:23:21.710 interesting aspects for further more
01:23:24.700 01:23:24.710 detailed analysis lie data pending and
01:23:27.880 01:23:27.890 all of those caveats and but we we I
01:23:32.170 01:23:32.180 think we made some good steps forward at
01:23:33.970 01:23:33.980 least in the public domain for data the
01:23:36.850 01:23:36.860 link between induced consumer products
01:23:40.060 01:23:40.070 and and the plastic and petrochemical
01:23:42.640 01:23:42.650 products that we use and the impact on
01:23:45.460 01:23:45.470 or demand I think we we drew some some
01:23:47.770 01:23:47.780 nice links there both physically and in
01:23:50.260 01:23:50.270 the dynamics front on the feedstock
01:23:52.390 01:23:52.400 front and but we could we could go a lot
01:23:56.170 01:23:56.180 more high-resolution on that front I
01:23:57.580 01:23:57.590 think a lot of a lot of the kind of more
01:24:00.400 01:24:00.410 detailed case studies outside plastics
01:24:02.560 01:24:02.570 as well fibre rubber fertilizers in more
01:24:06.130 01:24:06.140 detail would be great to look at on
01:24:08.470 01:24:08.480 their on the more consumption end and do
01:24:10.720 01:24:10.730 a kind of full
01:24:12.310 01:24:12.320 you know bottom-up analysis of those
01:24:15.510 01:24:15.520 consumption drivers in even more detail
01:24:17.380 01:24:17.390 would be would be great to do and yeah
01:24:21.040 01:24:21.050 and I think I mean I'm not sure whether
01:24:23.260 01:24:23.270 this would be in the remit of the DIA
01:24:25.660 01:24:25.670 but then I think some it's one of the
01:24:29.470 01:24:29.480 one of the key drivers that I envisage
01:24:31.990 01:24:32.000 being for the on the environmental side
01:24:34.480 01:24:34.490 is the the plastic waste leakage issue I
01:24:38.470 01:24:38.480 think is really garnering attention and
01:24:41.350 01:24:41.360 you know capturing hearts and minds and
01:24:42.940 01:24:42.950 and I think the the extent to which that
01:24:45.940 01:24:45.950 can kind of action behavioral change on
01:24:48.250 01:24:48.260 the littering front and waste management
01:24:49.990 01:24:50.000 front I think it's an area that would be
01:24:52.780 01:24:52.790 great to study and see how we can
01:24:54.550 01:24:54.560 galvanize the support this obviously
01:24:57.640 01:24:57.650 there
01:24:58.590 01:24:58.600 in lots of communities and so the kind
01:25:01.530 01:25:01.540 of behavioral links on that front would
01:25:03.180 01:25:03.190 be would be really interesting to to
01:25:05.070 01:25:05.080 analyze I think great well thank you so
01:25:08.130 01:25:08.140 much for joining us Peter is straight
01:25:10.500 01:25:10.510 off a plane from Paris so now I hope
01:25:13.530 01:25:13.540 they'll have a well-deserved dinner and
01:25:15.780 01:25:15.790 a night of rest and thank you all for
01:25:17.970 01:25:17.980 joining us as well I just want to remind
01:25:19.740 01:25:19.750 you that the full video recording of
01:25:21.360 01:25:21.370 this event will be available on the
01:25:22.530 01:25:22.540 website and on our website in a few days
01:25:24.620 01:25:24.630 and our podcast is something you can
01:25:27.420 01:25:27.430 also subscribe to on iTunes and a number
01:25:31.170 01:25:31.180 of other platforms I haven't even heard
01:25:32.760 01:25:32.770 of like stitcher and SoundCloud that
01:25:35.490 01:25:35.500 make me feel bit old I also just want to
01:25:37.890 01:25:37.900 highlight a couple of great events that
01:25:39.900 01:25:39.910 we have coming up one is on October 19th
01:25:42.960 01:25:42.970 in the morning here on campus the impact
01:25:45.720 01:25:45.730 of us LNG on Russian natural gas export
01:25:48.510 01:25:48.520 policy were pleased to be joined by one
01:25:51.390 01:25:51.400 of our cg up fellows dr. Tatiana Metro
01:25:53.880 01:25:53.890 vu who's also the director of the school
01:25:56.430 01:25:56.440 Cova Energy Center in Moscow as well as
01:25:58.860 01:25:58.870 a number of other panelists who will be
01:26:00.690 01:26:00.700 joining her on that topic and then on
01:26:02.880 01:26:02.890 October 26 the a will be back talking
01:26:07.590 01:26:07.600 about renewable their renewable energy
01:26:10.440 01:26:10.450 market report for 2018 and the speaker
01:26:12.630 01:26:12.640 will be Jaime Behar who is a renewable
01:26:15.120 01:26:15.130 experts a renewable expert at the IEA so
01:26:18.630 01:26:18.640 please keep those dates in mind and we
01:26:20.310 01:26:20.320 look forward to seeing you again soon
01:26:21.420 01:26:21.430 thank you all so much for coming
01:26:23.490 01:26:23.500 [Applause]
Office location
Engineering company LOTUS®
Russia, Ekaterinburg, Lunacharskogo street, 240/12

Phone: +7 343 216 77 75

E-mail: info@lotus1.ru

Sales phone

Russia: +7 343 216 77 75

WhatsApp: +79122710308