Inside Story - Why is US president-elect Donald Trump against the TPP deal

WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:00.620
dumping the TPP the US president-elect
00:00:04.010 00:00:04.020 vows to withdraw from the world's
00:00:06.499 00:00:06.509 largest free trade agreement Donald
00:00:09.200 00:00:09.210 Trump calls it a potential disaster
00:00:11.570 00:00:11.580 so is he rewriting global trade rules
00:00:14.480 00:00:14.490 and is it a sign of increasing
00:00:16.760 00:00:16.770 protectionism this is inside story
00:00:35.600 00:00:35.610 hello and welcome to the program I'm
00:00:37.889 00:00:37.899 Martine Dennis now Donald Trump is not
00:00:40.170 00:00:40.180 in office yet but he's already announced
00:00:42.030 00:00:42.040 what he will do on his first day in the
00:00:43.950 00:00:43.960 White House withdraw the u.s. from the
00:00:46.080 00:00:46.090 long awaited trans-pacific partnership
00:00:48.119 00:00:48.129 agreement or TPP now this is one of the
00:00:51.390 00:00:51.400 main pledges he made during this year's
00:00:53.640 00:00:53.650 bitterly fought campaign the deal brings
00:00:56.399 00:00:56.409 together some of the world's biggest
00:00:57.810 00:00:57.820 economies in the hope of creating a
00:01:00.420 00:01:00.430 single market but what happens if the
00:01:02.610 00:01:02.620 u.s. pulls out we've got lots to get
00:01:05.070 00:01:05.080 onto with our guest but first this
00:01:07.080 00:01:07.090 reporter and Rob Mathison defying
00:01:11.940 00:01:11.950 convention yet again president-elect
00:01:14.249 00:01:14.259 Donald Trump bypasses the press and uses
00:01:17.279 00:01:17.289 a facebook video to say he'll pull the
00:01:19.499 00:01:19.509 u.s. out of the world's largest trade
00:01:21.690 00:01:21.700 deal known as the TPP I am going to
00:01:24.480 00:01:24.490 issue our notification of intent to
00:01:26.910 00:01:26.920 withdraw from the trans-pacific
00:01:28.499 00:01:28.509 partnership a potential disaster for our
00:01:31.560 00:01:31.570 country instead we will negotiate fair
00:01:34.649 00:01:34.659 bilateral trade deals that bring jobs
00:01:36.870 00:01:36.880 and industry back on to American shores
00:01:39.179 00:01:39.189 it was one of Trump's main election
00:01:42.090 00:01:42.100 pledges to ditch a deal that has been at
00:01:44.399 00:01:44.409 the heart of the Obama administration
00:01:46.490 00:01:46.500 now the leader of one of the other
00:01:48.630 00:01:48.640 eleven countries which signed up to it
00:01:50.580 00:01:50.590 says the trans-pacific deal could be
00:01:52.859 00:01:52.869 dead TPP is meaningless without the
00:01:58.649 00:01:58.659 United States it is for the same reason
00:02:01.080 00:02:01.090 that the renegotiation is impossible
00:02:03.090 00:02:03.100 this would disturb the fundamental
00:02:05.100 00:02:05.110 balance of the benefits the deal has
00:02:07.950 00:02:07.960 taken seven years to negotiate if it's
00:02:10.710 00:02:10.720 implemented it would create a huge
00:02:12.630 00:02:12.640 single market similar to the EU members
00:02:16.289 00:02:16.299 would agree to common wolves aimed at
00:02:18.180 00:02:18.190 making trade easier between them such as
00:02:20.670 00:02:20.680 transparency when doing deals
00:02:22.430 00:02:22.440 particularly those involving governments
00:02:24.780 00:02:24.790 and working to cut unfair competition
00:02:26.970 00:02:26.980 and increase copyright controls
00:02:31.390 00:02:31.400 those who sign up would also reduce or
00:02:34.460 00:02:34.470 remove taxes on imports between member
00:02:36.950 00:02:36.960 countries 18,000 tariffs and all US
00:02:40.220 00:02:40.230 manufactured goods and almost all US
00:02:42.740 00:02:42.750 farm products would go but critics say
00:02:48.410 00:02:48.420 the fine print of the deals been
00:02:49.940 00:02:49.950 shrouded in secrecy they say it allows
00:02:52.550 00:02:52.560 big corporations too much control over
00:02:54.890 00:02:54.900 worldwide trade and that many of the
00:02:57.260 00:02:57.270 common rules in the TPP are already
00:02:59.630 00:02:59.640 being covered by existing worldwide
00:03:01.820 00:03:01.830 trade legislation some of those who
00:03:04.760 00:03:04.770 didn't sign up which includes China and
00:03:06.980 00:03:06.990 Russia believe countries may have been
00:03:09.380 00:03:09.390 isolated so you Sliema curcumin given
00:03:13.340 00:03:13.350 orally 8na if we want to affect the
00:03:15.590 00:03:15.600 processes of the world economy then
00:03:17.600 00:03:17.610 closed alliances such as the
00:03:19.280 00:03:19.290 trans-pacific partnership should not be
00:03:21.440 00:03:21.450 created if this happens then this will
00:03:23.810 00:03:23.820 not be good neither to the development
00:03:26.000 00:03:26.010 of world trade nor to the world economy
00:03:28.400 00:03:28.410 in general Trump is determined to pull
00:03:33.380 00:03:33.390 the u.s. out of the trans-pacific
00:03:34.880 00:03:34.890 partnership agreement 7 years of
00:03:37.430 00:03:37.440 negotiations may have to be unpicked and
00:03:39.770 00:03:39.780 it seems no one really knows what will
00:03:42.770 00:03:42.780 happen next
00:03:43.610 00:03:43.620 Rob Matheson for Inside Story
00:03:50.190 00:03:50.200 all right time to introduce our guests
00:03:52.690 00:03:52.700 now in Singapore we have Malcolm cook a
00:03:54.520 00:03:54.530 senior fellow at the Institute of
00:03:56.290 00:03:56.300 Southeast Asian Studies and a specialist
00:03:58.630 00:03:58.640 on the political economy of East Asia in
00:04:00.729 00:04:00.739 London we have Nick Deardon Director of
00:04:03.130 00:04:03.140 Global justice now which campaigns on
00:04:05.559 00:04:05.569 issues of global justice and development
00:04:07.600 00:04:07.610 in the global south joining us on skype
00:04:09.699 00:04:09.709 from Busan in South Korea we have Robert
00:04:12.430 00:04:12.440 Kelley professor of international
00:04:14.199 00:04:14.209 relations at Busan National University
00:04:16.479 00:04:16.489 welcome to you or can I start with you
00:04:18.370 00:04:18.380 Malcolm if President Trump the future
00:04:22.120 00:04:22.130 President Trump actually is true to his
00:04:24.280 00:04:24.290 word and pulls the u.s. out of the TPP
00:04:27.909 00:04:27.919 agreement is that it is that game off
00:04:30.250 00:04:30.260 well as the TPP is presently negotiated
00:04:34.750 00:04:34.760 death because countries accounting for
00:04:37.210 00:04:37.220 85% of the total GDP of the 12 countries
00:04:40.510 00:04:40.520 have to ratify the TPP for it to become
00:04:43.810 00:04:43.820 active and the United States and Japan
00:04:46.180 00:04:46.190 by themselves or more than 15% so if the
00:04:50.050 00:04:50.060 u.s. does pull out of the TPP the TPP
00:04:53.140 00:04:53.150 signed last year is effectively dead but
00:04:57.159 00:04:57.169 couldn't the remaining members of the
00:05:00.550 00:05:00.560 remaining 11 members couldn't a minimum
00:05:04.210 00:05:04.220 of six of them with a volume of trade
00:05:06.880 00:05:06.890 amounting to 85 percent of the overall
00:05:10.290 00:05:10.300 bloc's trade could they not rescue could
00:05:14.830 00:05:14.840 they not salvage the deal if indeed they
00:05:16.930 00:05:16.940 really wanted to there was a meeting at
00:05:19.810 00:05:19.820 the APEC summit in Peru just last
00:05:22.240 00:05:22.250 weekend among the TPP signatories that
00:05:24.730 00:05:24.740 aren't planning to pull out and they're
00:05:26.409 00:05:26.419 talking already about renegotiating that
00:05:29.140 00:05:29.150 single clause to remove the 85 percent
00:05:32.260 00:05:32.270 requirement so there could be a TPP 2.0
00:05:37.240 00:05:37.250 but many of the things as noted by a
00:05:39.430 00:05:39.440 reporter negotiated then the TPP are
00:05:42.600 00:05:42.610 basically driven by US interests so the
00:05:45.969 00:05:45.979 countries that signed up to the TPP many
00:05:48.940 00:05:48.950 of them signed up for things that they
00:05:50.800 00:05:50.810 wouldn't have signed up for if the
00:05:52.810 00:05:52.820 United States wasn't a negotiating
00:05:54.730 00:05:54.740 member so it's hard to see how the
00:05:56.950 00:05:56.960 present TPP
00:05:58.480 00:05:58.490 could survive at Donald Trump's threat
00:06:01.480 00:06:01.490 okay Robert in Busan in South Korea the
00:06:06.219 00:06:06.229 South Koreans are not signed up to TPP
00:06:08.710 00:06:08.720 how does it look from there is this the
00:06:11.409 00:06:11.419 are they rather happy that they didn't
00:06:13.390 00:06:13.400 get involved in this or is there is
00:06:14.890 00:06:14.900 there some inclination to join an
00:06:18.040 00:06:18.050 alternative larger trade pact hey thanks
00:06:22.689 00:06:22.699 for having me um I don't think the South
00:06:24.580 00:06:24.590 Koreans were that worried about it this
00:06:26.110 00:06:26.120 much a good deal South Korea already has
00:06:29.080 00:06:29.090 a direct bilateral free trade agreement
00:06:31.899 00:06:31.909 with the United States and one with the
00:06:33.580 00:06:33.590 European Union those are two of its
00:06:35.559 00:06:35.569 biggest markets its other two big
00:06:36.999 00:06:37.009 markets are Japan and China and it's
00:06:39.909 00:06:39.919 been working on trying to hammer out
00:06:41.740 00:06:41.750 trade deals with them you know if you
00:06:43.960 00:06:43.970 look at some of the other members of TPP
00:06:45.339 00:06:45.349 it includes places like Vietnam and Peru
00:06:47.110 00:06:47.120 and Malaysia those are small markets for
00:06:49.659 00:06:49.669 the South Koreans I do think there's a
00:06:51.969 00:06:51.979 security element to the trans-pacific
00:06:53.740 00:06:53.750 partnership that the South Koreans would
00:06:55.390 00:06:55.400 like to see which is that the
00:06:56.890 00:06:56.900 trans-pacific partnership the TPP
00:06:58.620 00:06:58.630 undergirds the American pivot to Asia
00:07:01.120 00:07:01.130 which is important for the security of
00:07:03.010 00:07:03.020 places like Japan and South Korea and
00:07:04.749 00:07:04.759 Taiwan I would imagine that all of their
00:07:06.610 00:07:06.620 political elites are a little bit upset
00:07:08.110 00:07:08.120 that this will go by the board because
00:07:09.909 00:07:09.919 it would thicken the American presence
00:07:12.070 00:07:12.080 out here but you know Trump's just he
00:07:15.520 00:07:15.530 just doesn't want okay Nick in London
00:07:18.459 00:07:18.469 it's not just a matter of traders as
00:07:20.770 00:07:20.780 Robert alluded to is it with trade comes
00:07:23.980 00:07:23.990 influence is the u.s. if indeed this
00:07:26.379 00:07:26.389 comes through is the u.s. giving up
00:07:28.260 00:07:28.270 influence in the Pacific region I don't
00:07:32.980 00:07:32.990 think so I think I mean we need to wait
00:07:35.110 00:07:35.120 and see but I think that Trump's
00:07:36.520 00:07:36.530 strategy isn't an anti trade strategy or
00:07:38.709 00:07:38.719 an anti business strategy in fact in
00:07:40.360 00:07:40.370 some ways I think he's going to be
00:07:41.620 00:07:41.630 extremely helpful especially to the most
00:07:44.140 00:07:44.150 reckless is and reckless and damaging
00:07:45.640 00:07:45.650 businesses the fossil fuel industry the
00:07:47.649 00:07:47.659 financial industry big pharmaceuticals
00:07:49.420 00:07:49.430 and so on if anything I would say he
00:07:51.850 00:07:51.860 doesn't believe this deal to be far
00:07:53.950 00:07:53.960 enough in the interests of those big
00:07:55.809 00:07:55.819 corporations which is something that
00:07:57.339 00:07:57.349 most of us who've been campaigning
00:07:58.779 00:07:58.789 against this do regard as pretty
00:08:01.120 00:08:01.130 fanciful really and but I do think that
00:08:03.370 00:08:03.380 it's important to remember that although
00:08:04.930 00:08:04.940 Trump has said that he will withdraw
00:08:07.510 00:08:07.520 from TPP on the first day I don't think
00:08:09.790 00:08:09.800 we have Trump to
00:08:11.600 00:08:11.610 thank for the defeat of this treaty I
00:08:13.070 00:08:13.080 think we've got many many hundreds of
00:08:15.439 00:08:15.449 thousands of grassroots activists who've
00:08:17.089 00:08:17.099 been campaigning against this treaty for
00:08:18.950 00:08:18.960 the last two three four years now before
00:08:21.830 00:08:21.840 Donald Trump had even heard about okay
00:08:23.540 00:08:23.550 are the ones that have defeated it Nick
00:08:25.490 00:08:25.500 I'd like to come to that a little bit
00:08:27.050 00:08:27.060 later on in the program
00:08:28.129 00:08:28.139 in the meantime Malcolm can we just find
00:08:30.050 00:08:30.060 out who were the potential beneficiaries
00:08:33.319 00:08:33.329 of the TPP and who perhaps were the
00:08:36.829 00:08:36.839 biggest losers I guess if it were to go
00:08:40.219 00:08:40.229 through and it's still not dead Japan
00:08:43.069 00:08:43.079 would probably be the biggest winner cuz
00:08:44.870 00:08:44.880 it doesn't have a bilateral free trade
00:08:46.610 00:08:46.620 agreement with the United States its
00:08:49.040 00:08:49.050 second largest trading partner in Japan
00:08:51.079 00:08:51.089 is still the third largest economy in
00:08:53.630 00:08:53.640 the world so Japan being part of the TPP
00:08:56.319 00:08:56.329 changed that as well if you look at
00:08:58.730 00:08:58.740 countries that might lose the most in
00:09:00.800 00:09:00.810 relative terms Vietnam definitely was
00:09:03.620 00:09:03.630 seen to be the big winner it's the
00:09:05.680 00:09:05.690 poorest member of the TPP 12 and many
00:09:09.949 00:09:09.959 thought that it would get foreign direct
00:09:11.810 00:09:11.820 investment particularly in clothing and
00:09:14.060 00:09:14.070 apparel and auto parts that would have
00:09:16.430 00:09:16.440 traditionally gone to Thailand and other
00:09:18.620 00:09:18.630 countries and Malaysia as mentioned by
00:09:21.350 00:09:21.360 Robert that doesn't have a bilateral
00:09:23.600 00:09:23.610 free trade agreement with the United
00:09:25.100 00:09:25.110 States either it tried to negotiate one
00:09:27.800 00:09:27.810 and that failed so those are probably
00:09:30.019 00:09:30.029 the three countries that were the
00:09:32.990 00:09:33.000 strongest supporters in Asia of the TPP
00:09:35.180 00:09:35.190 and will be the saddest to see it go by
00:09:38.389 00:09:38.399 Singapore also but more for the
00:09:40.900 00:09:40.910 strategic side that Robert mentioned the
00:09:43.430 00:09:43.440 Singapore Prime Minister lectured
00:09:46.340 00:09:46.350 President Obama in public in the United
00:09:48.590 00:09:48.600 States about the importance of the
00:09:50.540 00:09:50.550 United States ratifying the TPP for the
00:09:53.810 00:09:53.820 United States strategic position in Asia
00:09:56.509 00:09:56.519 I think that message is still there
00:09:59.750 00:09:59.760 today
00:10:00.439 00:10:00.449 and it looks like the United States will
00:10:02.269 00:10:02.279 walk away from it so those are the four
00:10:04.579 00:10:04.589 Singapore Malaysia Vietnam and Japan for
00:10:08.449 00:10:08.459 four different reasons
00:10:09.680 00:10:09.690 all right Robert I'll come to you and I
00:10:11.840 00:10:11.850 know that you're an American I've heard
00:10:13.519 00:10:13.529 that you're from Cleveland and what
00:10:15.650 00:10:15.660 about America what about American
00:10:17.780 00:10:17.790 companies American companies stood to
00:10:19.550 00:10:19.560 gain significantly as well car
00:10:22.400 00:10:22.410 manufacturers for instance they would
00:10:24.530 00:10:24.540 have had
00:10:25.189 00:10:25.199 direct access into a place like Vietnam
00:10:27.769 00:10:27.779 which currently seriously imposes
00:10:30.530 00:10:30.540 seriously high tariffs on American car
00:10:32.929 00:10:32.939 imports and that must obviously be
00:10:35.269 00:10:35.279 something that's that he has thought
00:10:37.489 00:10:37.499 about and must have assimilated into his
00:10:39.799 00:10:39.809 plan he would be a net good for all the
00:10:45.199 00:10:45.209 participants I broadly think that that
00:10:47.150 00:10:47.160 free trade is a good thing lowers prices
00:10:49.519 00:10:49.529 and improves quality of goods things
00:10:50.929 00:10:50.939 like that particularly you know you
00:10:53.030 00:10:53.040 mentioned sort of Cleveland in the
00:10:54.109 00:10:54.119 Midwest I do think that's what Donald
00:10:55.819 00:10:55.829 Trump was probably taking his cue from
00:10:57.229 00:10:57.239 that is to say that the so-called blue
00:10:59.359 00:10:59.369 wall that Donald Trump penetrated to
00:11:01.489 00:11:01.499 defeat Hillary Clinton was the Midwest
00:11:03.470 00:11:03.480 those places where I'm done from there
00:11:05.749 00:11:05.759 those places have all suffered
00:11:07.069 00:11:07.079 significantly under globalization from
00:11:09.650 00:11:09.660 foreign import competition particularly
00:11:11.030 00:11:11.040 in manufacturing those jobs have left
00:11:12.679 00:11:12.689 Donald Trump promised to bring them back
00:11:14.840 00:11:14.850 as many presidents have before they do
00:11:16.699 00:11:16.709 not come back but that message resonates
00:11:19.460 00:11:19.470 and if Donald Trump wants to get
00:11:20.720 00:11:20.730 reelected in four years he's going to
00:11:22.249 00:11:22.259 need those votes again he very much
00:11:24.109 00:11:24.119 appealed to the white working-class the
00:11:25.879 00:11:25.889 United States you very much appeal to
00:11:27.379 00:11:27.389 the Nostalgia many Americans have for
00:11:29.780 00:11:29.790 manufacturing and the production of soar
00:11:31.759 00:11:31.769 tangible items and the belief is that
00:11:34.819 00:11:34.829 places you know in Donald Trump's mind
00:11:36.889 00:11:36.899 the belief is that places like Malaysia
00:11:38.150 00:11:38.160 and Japan cheat on these things Trump
00:11:40.489 00:11:40.499 has repeatedly you know Trump from
00:11:42.109 00:11:42.119 taking this stuff for 30 years and I
00:11:43.759 00:11:43.769 think that's I think that's the
00:11:44.900 00:11:44.910 political calculation behind this I
00:11:46.729 00:11:46.739 don't actually think that the Trump
00:11:48.259 00:11:48.269 administration is thinking about the
00:11:49.850 00:11:49.860 opening of markets in Southeast Asia for
00:11:51.799 00:11:51.809 American corporations I think he's
00:11:53.449 00:11:53.459 thinking about voters and laborers all
00:11:57.139 00:11:57.149 right Nick I'm also part of mr. Trump's
00:12:00.079 00:12:00.089 plan is is he said establishing or
00:12:02.840 00:12:02.850 negotiating bilateral trade deals how
00:12:05.150 00:12:05.160 easy is that going to be given given the
00:12:08.299 00:12:08.309 world order at the moment which seems to
00:12:09.889 00:12:09.899 be made up with more and more
00:12:10.939 00:12:10.949 multilateral deals that's absolutely
00:12:14.749 00:12:14.759 true but if the multilateral deal isn't
00:12:16.400 00:12:16.410 on the table then many countries may
00:12:17.840 00:12:17.850 take a bilateral deal because they
00:12:19.369 00:12:19.379 prefer that to nothing and I think one
00:12:22.069 00:12:22.079 of the worries about bilateral deals I
00:12:23.869 00:12:23.879 mean all of this all of multilateral or
00:12:25.699 00:12:25.709 bilateral it all depends on how you
00:12:26.989 00:12:26.999 actually negotiate it but of course
00:12:28.729 00:12:28.739 there is the possibility that a
00:12:30.169 00:12:30.179 bilateral deal could be even worse for a
00:12:32.720 00:12:32.730 poorer more developing country because
00:12:34.639 00:12:34.649 they're going to have far less ability
00:12:35.960 00:12:35.970 to stand up to the might of the US if
00:12:38.419 00:12:38.429 that's
00:12:38.810 00:12:38.820 the only country that they're
00:12:40.100 00:12:40.110 negotiating with all right now as Nick
00:12:43.550 00:12:43.560 mentioned there's been a lot of public
00:12:46.520 00:12:46.530 disaffection with these kinds of big
00:12:48.740 00:12:48.750 deals it's not just the TPP that's
00:12:50.630 00:12:50.640 facing opposition there seems to be a
00:12:52.790 00:12:52.800 global growing public resentment over
00:12:55.160 00:12:55.170 these big multinational trade deals some
00:12:57.680 00:12:57.690 of them are often conducted in secret
00:13:01.040 00:13:01.050 and made without citizen input this is
00:13:03.830 00:13:03.840 one of the the big complaints deals
00:13:06.260 00:13:06.270 including the North American Free Trade
00:13:08.120 00:13:08.130 Agreement NAFTA and the transatlantic
00:13:10.280 00:13:10.290 trade and investment partnership TTIP
00:13:12.920 00:13:12.930 are seen by some as being opposed to or
00:13:15.890 00:13:15.900 undermining the rights of workers and
00:13:18.850 00:13:18.860 some including Donald Trump say
00:13:21.050 00:13:21.060 international trade deals actually
00:13:23.030 00:13:23.040 killed jobs at home so Nick can I come
00:13:25.700 00:13:25.710 back to you and try and get some
00:13:27.500 00:13:27.510 explanation as to why there seems to be
00:13:29.180 00:13:29.190 this growing tide of public anger in
00:13:32.570 00:13:32.580 many countries against these
00:13:34.130 00:13:34.140 multilateral trade deal secrecy is one
00:13:36.800 00:13:36.810 of the issues that they raised secrecy
00:13:40.550 00:13:40.560 is a huge thing so with the multilateral
00:13:42.020 00:13:42.030 trade deals TPP and TTIP and so on
00:13:44.120 00:13:44.130 there's been very little public
00:13:46.250 00:13:46.260 information there's been very little in
00:13:48.050 00:13:48.060 our country very little parliamentary
00:13:49.430 00:13:49.440 scrutiny of TTIP or cita the deal is
00:13:51.860 00:13:51.870 being done with Canada in the European
00:13:53.540 00:13:53.550 Union and this is huge because look when
00:13:56.090 00:13:56.100 we're talking about these trade deals
00:13:57.140 00:13:57.150 we're not just talking about tariffs
00:13:58.880 00:13:58.890 packages most people think of trade
00:14:00.500 00:14:00.510 deals as we try and reduce tariffs on
00:14:02.210 00:14:02.220 both sides so that Goods can flow more
00:14:03.950 00:14:03.960 easily and services can flow more easily
00:14:05.780 00:14:05.790 in and out of countries but when it
00:14:07.490 00:14:07.500 comes to the TPP we're actually looking
00:14:09.470 00:14:09.480 at non what are called non-tariff
00:14:11.210 00:14:11.220 barriers and that is regulation
00:14:13.460 00:14:13.470 essentially that that goes to the heart
00:14:15.620 00:14:15.630 of whether a government is able to enact
00:14:17.570 00:14:17.580 laws without being challenged by big
00:14:19.880 00:14:19.890 business over food quality standards for
00:14:22.310 00:14:22.320 example over how we should run public
00:14:24.110 00:14:24.120 services so the difference with the TPP
00:14:26.630 00:14:26.640 I think and past trade deals is it goes
00:14:28.670 00:14:28.680 really to the heart of our democracy our
00:14:30.710 00:14:30.720 governments able anymore to enact laws
00:14:34.220 00:14:34.230 in a way that won't be challenged by big
00:14:37.700 00:14:37.710 investors because the big investors say
00:14:39.500 00:14:39.510 well no sorry you're putting cigarettes
00:14:41.120 00:14:41.130 in plain packaging that damages my
00:14:43.010 00:14:43.020 profits and it seems increasingly to
00:14:45.410 00:14:45.420 people that with these big trade
00:14:46.700 00:14:46.710 packages nothing is more important than
00:14:48.890 00:14:48.900 the right to suppose it right to make a
00:14:50.540 00:14:50.550 profit it seems to come above
00:14:52.280 00:14:52.290 our human rights our ability to fight
00:14:54.019 00:14:54.029 climate change our ability to provide
00:14:55.699 00:14:55.709 affordable medicines to people in our
00:14:58.309 00:14:58.319 society and so on and that'sa worry
00:15:00.590 00:15:00.600 Robert isn't it the the worry seems to
00:15:03.679 00:15:03.689 be that these big multilateral trade
00:15:05.569 00:15:05.579 deals actually empower the big companies
00:15:08.629 00:15:08.639 and reduce the influence of individual
00:15:12.049 00:15:12.059 governments the sovereignty of a
00:15:13.309 00:15:13.319 particular country and that of course
00:15:14.960 00:15:14.970 impacts upon as Nick was saying the
00:15:17.629 00:15:17.639 lives the ordinary lives of people yeah
00:15:20.629 00:15:20.639 I think that's correct I mean we live in
00:15:22.460 00:15:22.470 a democratic age most of the
00:15:24.139 00:15:24.149 participants in the TPP are democratic
00:15:25.999 00:15:26.009 or moving in that direction the
00:15:28.340 00:15:28.350 transparency of trade deals the lack of
00:15:30.799 00:15:30.809 transparency is a genuine problem people
00:15:33.169 00:15:33.179 expect information to that I would only
00:15:36.169 00:15:36.179 say that these trade deals are often
00:15:37.729 00:15:37.739 inordinately complex the deal between
00:15:40.039 00:15:40.049 Korea and the United States for example
00:15:41.779 00:15:41.789 which I know is 1,100 pages
00:15:44.029 00:15:44.039 I imagine the deal the TPP deal is two
00:15:46.879 00:15:46.889 or three times that right now if you
00:15:48.739 00:15:48.749 open these things up for conversation
00:15:49.969 00:15:49.979 for debate at every single point you'll
00:15:52.279 00:15:52.289 simply never have trade deals I mean
00:15:53.869 00:15:53.879 some of this stuff simply has to be
00:15:54.979 00:15:54.989 worked out by the lawyers and the
00:15:56.090 00:15:56.100 accounts this is actually how
00:15:57.529 00:15:57.539 parliamentary procedure works in many
00:15:59.449 00:15:59.459 democracies in the United States
00:16:00.979 00:16:00.989 congressmen very rarely read the entire
00:16:03.019 00:16:03.029 piece of legislation that gets voted on
00:16:04.669 00:16:04.679 I mean you could sort of insist on
00:16:06.379 00:16:06.389 ripping these things open and debating
00:16:07.759 00:16:07.769 on piece by piece but then and the
00:16:09.199 00:16:09.209 legislative process in many states
00:16:10.579 00:16:10.589 wouldn't it simply wouldn't occur um I
00:16:13.249 00:16:13.259 do share the concern about sort of the
00:16:14.749 00:16:14.759 influence with large corporations I
00:16:16.039 00:16:16.049 would dispute the notion that states are
00:16:17.479 00:16:17.489 somehow giving up their ability to
00:16:19.129 00:16:19.139 actually pursue regulation first of all
00:16:20.989 00:16:20.999 it's not really clear to me that
00:16:21.979 00:16:21.989 harmonization of regulation means the
00:16:23.779 00:16:23.789 rollback of regulation I do think
00:16:25.849 00:16:25.859 there's a difference
00:16:27.019 00:16:27.029 second there are interstate dispute
00:16:29.090 00:16:29.100 mechanisms for these things where states
00:16:30.409 00:16:30.419 can bring their concerns and complaints
00:16:32.059 00:16:32.069 and decisions can be sort of hammered
00:16:33.889 00:16:33.899 out the whole point is to sort of create
00:16:35.779 00:16:35.789 common standards so the movement of
00:16:37.609 00:16:37.619 goods and services is easier it's not
00:16:39.710 00:16:39.720 necessarily to throw regulatory
00:16:42.049 00:16:42.059 standards to corporations it's to
00:16:43.460 00:16:43.470 generate sort of simplicity between
00:16:46.609 00:16:46.619 states so that so that goods and
00:16:49.009 00:16:49.019 services can move and Malcolm so so
00:16:51.529 00:16:51.539 Roberts saying that it shouldn't be
00:16:54.619 00:16:54.629 these these kinds of deals shouldn't be
00:16:56.269 00:16:56.279 viewed with quite so much suspicion but
00:16:58.129 00:16:58.139 still they are do you think that opening
00:17:00.229 00:17:00.239 them up to more scrutiny having more
00:17:03.499 00:17:03.509 transparency would alleviate some of
00:17:05.720 00:17:05.730 this public dissatisfaction that we've
00:17:07.640 00:17:07.650 been witnessing in the past year alone
00:17:09.760 00:17:09.770 it's probably worth noting even if
00:17:12.049 00:17:12.059 Hillary Clinton had won she had said
00:17:14.090 00:17:14.100 that she wouldn't sign the existing TPP
00:17:16.880 00:17:16.890 either so there's certainly bipartisan
00:17:19.340 00:17:19.350 in the United States and not only in the
00:17:21.140 00:17:21.150 United States concerns but part of it
00:17:23.870 00:17:23.880 goes back to the negotiations trade
00:17:25.789 00:17:25.799 deals are often I'll give you something
00:17:28.490 00:17:28.500 in return for getting something back
00:17:30.710 00:17:30.720 from you that's why they're so long and
00:17:32.659 00:17:32.669 complicated and as Robert noted if each
00:17:35.450 00:17:35.460 of those stages of negotiation and
00:17:37.820 00:17:37.830 giving and taking is open to a public
00:17:40.490 00:17:40.500 process in each country then you
00:17:42.799 00:17:42.809 probably wouldn't get any trade deals at
00:17:45.289 00:17:45.299 all one reason that we're having
00:17:47.360 00:17:47.370 regional trade deals or bilateral ones
00:17:50.000 00:17:50.010 is the global WTO system is broken and
00:17:54.260 00:17:54.270 isn't working anymore so countries are
00:17:56.750 00:17:56.760 having to shift to less optimal in terms
00:17:59.810 00:17:59.820 of size so I think if you want trade
00:18:03.230 00:18:03.240 deals that deal with more than tariffs
00:18:06.460 00:18:06.470 you're going to have to accept a level
00:18:08.960 00:18:08.970 of transparency or not having them at
00:18:11.210 00:18:11.220 all and Nick so it's been mentioned then
00:18:14.390 00:18:14.400 that a significant part of these trade
00:18:17.720 00:18:17.730 deals is the harmonization of standards
00:18:19.310 00:18:19.320 at standards in terms of food quality
00:18:23.570 00:18:23.580 for instance Environmental Protection
00:18:26.450 00:18:26.460 for instance does it always have to fall
00:18:28.669 00:18:28.679 to the lowest common denominator or can
00:18:30.650 00:18:30.660 it have a positive side I'm thinking
00:18:32.480 00:18:32.490 perhaps of of developing countries
00:18:35.840 00:18:35.850 joining in with more developed countries
00:18:38.120 00:18:38.130 and thereby having to adopt a minimum
00:18:40.340 00:18:40.350 wage for instance well maybe not a
00:18:43.880 00:18:43.890 minimum wage but I take the point there
00:18:45.680 00:18:45.690 that I think that a race to the top
00:18:47.720 00:18:47.730 rather than a race to the bottom should
00:18:49.190 00:18:49.200 be absolutely possible that we're not
00:18:50.659 00:18:50.669 against trade and I think there were
00:18:52.820 00:18:52.830 ways and ways of negotiating trade
00:18:54.650 00:18:54.660 agreements and there have been examples
00:18:55.820 00:18:55.830 from Latin America too frankly the
00:18:58.250 00:18:58.260 single market in the European Union
00:18:59.870 00:18:59.880 where standards have increased as a
00:19:01.820 00:19:01.830 result of trade agreements I think one
00:19:04.010 00:19:04.020 of the problems with the type of
00:19:05.330 00:19:05.340 multilateral trade agreements on the
00:19:06.650 00:19:06.660 table at the moment is they seem to be
00:19:09.039 00:19:09.049 pointed in the opposite direction
00:19:10.760 00:19:10.770 towards further deregulation and when
00:19:13.130 00:19:13.140 you look at things like TPP it's not
00:19:14.780 00:19:14.790 difficult to see why that is because big
00:19:17.240 00:19:17.250 business is there
00:19:18.600 00:19:18.610 in many in many cases whispering in the
00:19:20.880 00:19:20.890 ears of the politicians at the
00:19:21.900 00:19:21.910 negotiating table saying we don't want
00:19:24.480 00:19:24.490 you know anti-gm provisions in the
00:19:26.370 00:19:26.380 european union and so on and then they
00:19:28.890 00:19:28.900 have this corporate court system which
00:19:31.169 00:19:31.179 allows big business and big investors
00:19:33.210 00:19:33.220 the right to a parallel legal tract so
00:19:35.669 00:19:35.679 they can sue governments for doing
00:19:37.080 00:19:37.090 things which essentially they don't
00:19:38.610 00:19:38.620 really like we as ordinary individuals
00:19:41.039 00:19:41.049 ordinary citizens don't get the ability
00:19:42.720 00:19:42.730 to access those kind of legal channels
00:19:44.820 00:19:44.830 so I think it's not really surprising
00:19:46.860 00:19:46.870 that people are suspicious of the deals
00:19:48.930 00:19:48.940 that are on the table at the moment but
00:19:50.400 00:19:50.410 I mean I absolutely take the point that
00:19:51.900 00:19:51.910 doesn't mean we need to stop trading it
00:19:53.760 00:19:53.770 means we need a fundamental rethink of
00:19:55.740 00:19:55.750 how we negotiate trade deals like this
00:19:57.480 00:19:57.490 and that's really urgent because you
00:19:59.580 00:19:59.590 know the disaffection that people have
00:20:01.140 00:20:01.150 felt with these kind of agreements is
00:20:02.460 00:20:02.470 exactly what led to the election of
00:20:04.710 00:20:04.720 someone as fanatical as Donald Trump
00:20:07.070 00:20:07.080 Robert I'm just wondering whether you
00:20:10.140 00:20:10.150 think that Donald Trump's election and
00:20:14.280 00:20:14.290 his decision to pull out of DPP TPP and
00:20:17.539 00:20:17.549 couple that with the brexit vote from a
00:20:20.490 00:20:20.500 few months ago I'm just wondering if
00:20:21.900 00:20:21.910 this is changing the direction of travel
00:20:23.460 00:20:23.470 for international business international
00:20:26.430 00:20:26.440 trade yeah I do think so I mean a lot of
00:20:30.600 00:20:30.610 will depend on what Trump does
00:20:31.860 00:20:31.870 particularly I mean the British economy
00:20:33.390 00:20:33.400 is substantially smaller than the
00:20:34.409 00:20:34.419 American economy so Trump will really
00:20:36.000 00:20:36.010 set a lot of the tone if he really goes
00:20:39.120 00:20:39.130 the protectionist route um I would say
00:20:41.760 00:20:41.770 though that I don't think you probably
00:20:42.870 00:20:42.880 will because once you actually start
00:20:45.180 00:20:45.190 throwing up 30 and 40 percent tariffs
00:20:47.010 00:20:47.020 against goods from Mexico or China or
00:20:48.539 00:20:48.549 whatever he's suggesting um those those
00:20:51.000 00:20:51.010 will those tariffs will feed through
00:20:52.560 00:20:52.570 into consumer prices you know if the
00:20:55.140 00:20:55.150 wall if Trump's voters were through the
00:20:57.419 00:20:57.429 Walmart demographic sort of downscale
00:20:59.460 00:20:59.470 working-class whites these are people
00:21:01.470 00:21:01.480 who actually rely on cheap imports from
00:21:03.299 00:21:03.309 Asia and Trump just hasn't mentioned
00:21:05.130 00:21:05.140 right Trump is focusing on the losses in
00:21:08.100 00:21:08.110 the labor market people who used to work
00:21:09.630 00:21:09.640 for manufacturing companies that have
00:21:11.700 00:21:11.710 since been turned into jobs been
00:21:13.470 00:21:13.480 robotized or sent to age or something
00:21:15.210 00:21:15.220 like that but what he hasn't mentioned I
00:21:16.950 00:21:16.960 think well we often miss in the trade
00:21:18.659 00:21:18.669 discussion is that people are also
00:21:20.130 00:21:20.140 consumers and then all this trade means
00:21:22.230 00:21:22.240 that all sorts of goods are suddenly
00:21:23.970 00:21:23.980 cheaper and of much better quality and
00:21:25.530 00:21:25.540 if you start throwing up these carriers
00:21:27.180 00:21:27.190 of Trump released if he pulls us out of
00:21:28.620 00:21:28.630 the WTO for example like he's
00:21:30.240 00:21:30.250 threatening I mean you can expect
00:21:31.680 00:21:31.690 American pride
00:21:32.310 00:21:32.320 to go up across the board can 15% right
00:21:35.279 00:21:35.289 China
00:21:35.940 00:21:35.950 I mean prices a Walmart about 20% or
00:21:37.860 00:21:37.870 more and those who thought that will
00:21:39.360 00:21:39.370 directly impact the bottom line from
00:21:41.220 00:21:41.230 Trump's orders it is not clear to me at
00:21:43.080 00:21:43.090 all that heavy protectionism is actually
00:21:44.999 00:21:45.009 in the interest of the white working
00:21:46.560 00:21:46.570 class or the working class generally in
00:21:48.450 00:21:48.460 the United States but you know if you go
00:21:50.009 00:21:50.019 down that route and equals the WTO or
00:21:52.019 00:21:52.029 NAFTA which is been around for 30 years
00:21:53.669 00:21:53.679 or 25 years I'm that yeah that'll be a
00:21:56.129 00:21:56.139 major fracture that that will change a
00:21:58.049 00:21:58.059 lot and how does it look from Singapore
00:22:00.840 00:22:00.850 Malcolm does it look as though there is
00:22:03.210 00:22:03.220 a big change on the horizon with the
00:22:05.430 00:22:05.440 election of Donald Trump in terms of
00:22:07.169 00:22:07.179 trade yeah I think but I think in Asia
00:22:11.249 00:22:11.259 it's this Essene largely as a Western
00:22:14.039 00:22:14.049 phenomenon both the brexit vote and
00:22:16.369 00:22:16.379 politics in Europe moving towards this
00:22:19.740 00:22:19.750 kind of radical right and the u.s.
00:22:22.049 00:22:22.059 decision election where Trump is now
00:22:24.779 00:22:24.789 president-elect I think if you look at
00:22:27.149 00:22:27.159 Asian countries they're very willing to
00:22:29.700 00:22:29.710 pursue regional alternatives for trade
00:22:32.999 00:22:33.009 liberalisation and investment
00:22:35.039 00:22:35.049 liberalization that don't include the
00:22:37.350 00:22:37.360 United States and many Asian countries
00:22:39.419 00:22:39.429 do not face the same democratic
00:22:42.269 00:22:42.279 pressures we've been talking about or
00:22:43.950 00:22:43.960 the same sense even within their own
00:22:46.320 00:22:46.330 populations that the economy is not
00:22:49.200 00:22:49.210 doing them well so we could see that
00:22:52.049 00:22:52.059 Asia powers ahead with trade agreements
00:22:54.810 00:22:54.820 that don't include the United States or
00:22:57.090 00:22:57.100 Europe and the United States and Europe
00:22:59.700 00:22:59.710 are left behind because they face these
00:23:02.249 00:23:02.259 pressures that aren't as visible in Asia
00:23:05.159 00:23:05.169 at all if you look at the Asian members
00:23:08.490 00:23:08.500 of the TPP the majority there is very
00:23:11.519 00:23:11.529 little sign that any of those countries
00:23:13.799 00:23:13.809 would face a problem ratifying the
00:23:16.680 00:23:16.690 agreement gentlemen I have to thank you
00:23:19.830 00:23:19.840 very much indeed
00:23:21.289 00:23:21.299 Malcolm cook Nick Deardon and Robert
00:23:24.509 00:23:24.519 Kelley thank you all very much and as
00:23:28.440 00:23:28.450 ever thank you for watching the program
00:23:30.330 00:23:30.340 now if you want to see the program again
00:23:32.159 00:23:32.169 you can go to the website aljazeera.com
00:23:34.409 00:23:34.419 if you want more discussion I'm sure
00:23:36.360 00:23:36.370 that there are lots of comments or
00:23:37.680 00:23:37.690 questions you'd like to ask on this
00:23:39.119 00:23:39.129 particular issue that is absorbing so
00:23:41.789 00:23:41.799 many people you can go to our Facebook
00:23:43.980 00:23:43.990 page facebook.com for
00:23:46.319 00:23:46.329 AJ inside story and of course there's
00:23:48.719 00:23:48.729 always a Twittersphere our handle is at
00:23:50.969 00:23:50.979 AJ inside story but for me Martine
00:23:53.939 00:23:53.949 Dennis and the whole team here in Doha
00:23:55.829 00:23:55.839 it's bye for now
Office location
Engineering company LOTUS®
Russia, Ekaterinburg, Lunacharskogo street, 240/12

Phone: +7 343 216 77 75

E-mail: info@lotus1.ru

Sales phone

Russia: +7 343 216 77 75

WhatsApp: +79122710308